13.02.2013 Views

sejal architectural glass limited - Securities and Exchange Board of ...

sejal architectural glass limited - Securities and Exchange Board of ...

sejal architectural glass limited - Securities and Exchange Board of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Litigation by Sejal Glass House<br />

5. C.C. No. 19/01 <strong>of</strong> 2005, Sejal Glass House (SGH) versus Yash Distributors (YD) & another,<br />

In the Court <strong>of</strong> Metropolitan Magistrates, 24 th Court at Borivali, Mumbai<br />

Sejal Glass House has filed Criminal Complaint bearing no. 19/01 <strong>of</strong> 2005 in the Court <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Metropolitan Magistrates, 24 th Court at Borivali, Mumbai. SGH has alleged that Yash Distributors has<br />

issued two cheques, each for a sum <strong>of</strong> Rs. 55,000/- as payment for goods supplied to Yash<br />

Distributors. The said cheques were dishonoured. Sejal Glass House has filed the present complaint<br />

under section 138 read with section 141 <strong>of</strong> the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1831 claiming a total<br />

compensation <strong>of</strong> Rs. 1,18,220/-.<br />

The complaint is pending in the Court <strong>of</strong> the Metropolitan Magistrates, 24 th Court at Borivali, Mumbai.<br />

The complaint is listed for hearing on December 26, 2007.<br />

6. Complaint No. DF/MSD/433/06, Sejal Glass House (SGH) v. Metro Link (ML), before the<br />

Consumer Dispute Redressal Forum, Mumbai Suburban District.<br />

Sejal Glass House has filed a complaint bearing no. DF/MSD/433/06 before the Consumer Dispute<br />

Redressal Forum, Mumbai Suburban District. Sejal Glass House booked two consignments with Metro L<br />

ink to be transported by road <strong>and</strong> made necessary payments for the same. The consignment reached<br />

the destination, a customer <strong>of</strong> Sejal Glass House in broken condition. Sejal Glass House, has alleged<br />

that it has come to its notice after making enquiries, that the consignment was transported through<br />

railway, when it was booked to be transported by road. Sejal Glass House has alleged that the second<br />

consignment did not reach its destination. Sejal Glass House has further alleged that Metro Link has<br />

not responded to various enquiries made by it <strong>and</strong> to the legal notice sent by it. Sejal Glass House<br />

has claimed a compensation <strong>of</strong> Rs. 1,13,330/-, Rs. 63,300/- being the cost <strong>of</strong> the goods <strong>and</strong> Rs.<br />

50,000/- for mental agony <strong>and</strong> loss <strong>of</strong> business caused to the complaints.<br />

The Consumer Dispute Redressal Forum, Mumbai Suburban District, by its order dated May 14, 2007<br />

directed ML to pay an amount <strong>of</strong> Rs. 63,300/- together interest @ 9 % per annum from the date <strong>of</strong><br />

filing till realization, an amount <strong>of</strong> Rs. 500/- towards compensation <strong>of</strong> mental agony <strong>and</strong> harassment<br />

to Sejal Glass House <strong>and</strong> an amount <strong>of</strong> Rs. 500/- towards the costs <strong>of</strong> the litigation.<br />

Litigation against Sejal Glass House<br />

7. Pending Sales Tax Assessments:<br />

Sejal Glass House has received notices in respect <strong>of</strong> assessment periods as mentioned below:<br />

Serial No. Details <strong>of</strong> notice Date Amount <strong>of</strong><br />

duty<br />

(Amount in<br />

1. Notice under section 33(4) <strong>of</strong><br />

the Bombay Sales Tax, 1959, in<br />

respect <strong>of</strong> non-assessment in<br />

the period <strong>of</strong> April 1, 2003 to<br />

March 31, 2004<br />

2. Show Cause Notice under<br />

section 33(4) <strong>of</strong> the Bombay<br />

Sales Tax, 1959 in the period<br />

<strong>of</strong> April 1, 2004 to March 31,<br />

2005<br />

April 21,<br />

2005<br />

April 21,<br />

2006<br />

210<br />

Rs.)<br />

Not<br />

quantifiable<br />

Not<br />

quantifiable<br />

Status Authority<br />

where<br />

pending<br />

Next<br />

Hearing<br />

called on<br />

20-12-07<br />

Next<br />

Hearing<br />

called on<br />

20-12-07<br />

Sales Tax<br />

<strong>of</strong>ficer, Class<br />

– I, Borivali<br />

Division,<br />

Mumbai<br />

Sales Tax<br />

<strong>of</strong>ficer, Class<br />

– I, Borivali<br />

Division,<br />

Mumbai

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!