15.05.2013 Views

¿MISION CUMPLIDA? EVALUACIÓN DEL PROGRAMA DE ... - Novib

¿MISION CUMPLIDA? EVALUACIÓN DEL PROGRAMA DE ... - Novib

¿MISION CUMPLIDA? EVALUACIÓN DEL PROGRAMA DE ... - Novib

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

¿Misión cumplida? Evaluación Programa ON-LAC<br />

Executive Summary<br />

The evaluation of the Oxfam <strong>Novib</strong> Programme in Latin America (ON-LAC), conducted by<br />

the Foundation Rural Development Consult (CDR) between September and December<br />

2010, focused on the results of the cooperation between the agency and its counterparts in<br />

the area of food security and income generation (Aim 1), democratisation and<br />

participation (Aim 4) and gender-based violence and women’s rights (Aim 5). 1 The<br />

evaluation followed Oxfam <strong>Novib</strong>’s decision in 2009 to stop supporting non-governmental<br />

development organisations in Latin America. Its purpose was to analyse the contribution<br />

of the ON-LAC Programme in terms of the strategic results defined for the period, the<br />

outcomes achieved by counterpart organisations (part of them in a network), their overall<br />

strengths, as well as their interactions with Oxfam <strong>Novib</strong> as the sponsoring agency. The<br />

work covered the countries Mexico, Guatemala, Nicaragua, Colombia, Peru, Bolivia and<br />

Brazil, where Dutch public resources had mostly been deployed. The objectives of the<br />

Programme evaluation were two-fold:<br />

1. To report on the results (intended and unintended) achieved by Oxfam <strong>Novib</strong>’s<br />

LAC strategy in the period 2003-2009 (accountability).<br />

2. To provide input for organisational learning of Oxfam <strong>Novib</strong>/Oxfam International<br />

and counterparts, specifically on ON’s contribution to the results achieved and<br />

lessons that can be drawn from ON’s strategy in Latin America.<br />

The Oxfam <strong>Novib</strong> regional strategy for the period 2003-09 has been hugely significant. For<br />

decades it has been targeting structural changes in living conditions and socio-political<br />

contexts to favour the impoverished and marginal segments in Latin American society.<br />

Oxfam <strong>Novib</strong>’s choice to work closely with organisations constituted by and acting on<br />

behalf of those categories has been vital for bringing the Programme into practice.<br />

Cooperation with non-governmental organisations has been a hallmark of the agency’s<br />

intervention strategy, all the more so since <strong>Novib</strong> chose to align its policies with those of<br />

its partners in Oxfam International. 2 The established rights-based approach, serving as the<br />

foundation for the pillars of the various Aims, has been providing overall guidance for<br />

cooperation with its partners worldwide.<br />

Oxfam <strong>Novib</strong>’s approach features several characteristics on which the agency has<br />

distinguished itself over a much longer period than the one spanned by this evaluation.<br />

The gender focus was brought into <strong>Novib</strong>’s policies approximately three decades ago, by<br />

stimulating the creation of organisations in defence of women’s rights, autonomy and<br />

empowerment. It later evolved into a strategy for gender mainstreaming that included<br />

cross-cutting tools for analysis and action. Second, the objective of bringing the agency’s<br />

counterparts into national and regional networks was pursued from the 1990s onwards,<br />

accompanied by global advocacy, campaigns and programmes during the last decade. The<br />

networking and strategic alliance approach shifted into higher gear when, during the<br />

Programme period, environmental and climate concerns were incorporated into the<br />

overall Oxfam <strong>Novib</strong> strategy.<br />

1 In policy documents, Aim 1 is titled as the Right to a Sustainable Livelihood. Projects under Aim 1 in the area<br />

of microfinance were not included in the evaluation. Nor were projects relating to ethnic and cultural identity<br />

under Aim 5. Aims 2 (Basic social services) and 3 (Security), with scant activity during the period, were a priori<br />

excluded.<br />

2 The agency correspondingly changed its name in 2006.<br />

3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!