23.01.2018 Views

Museikon_1_2017

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

A Glimpse towards the Inside (interview) | 149<br />

Vase alese / The Chosen Vessels, painting from the private<br />

collection of Cristina Bogdan and Dragoş Bogdan.<br />

Robing in the light / Îmbrăcarea cu Lumină, oil on canvas.<br />

Interior with icons – Constantin Cioc’s workshop.<br />

cb: When you review an icon that you’ve already sent out<br />

into the world – you’ve given it, sold it, placed it inside a<br />

church or within an exhibition – does it still feel yours?<br />

cc: I don’t sign my paintings, even less my icons. I do<br />

admit I have a curiosity about my icons, about their road<br />

throughout the world, because I keep feeling them as mine,<br />

since they are the product of my hands. But once the icon<br />

is made flesh, meaning the icon as image set on wood and<br />

considered as completed, it no longer belongs to me and,<br />

obvious, neither it belongs to the solicitor. The icon begins to<br />

bear its own life, since it completely identifies with the saint<br />

it represents and who is present unspoken, simultaneously<br />

in both this world and the world beyond. The solicitor will<br />

indeed worship this icon and treasure it as something valuable,<br />

because he also has an existential reference to the<br />

icon. But, how should I put this? The icon does not belong<br />

to him. He will probably pass the icon as family inheritance<br />

and, most probably, the icon will travel throughout time.<br />

I cannot know if the icon made by my hand will possess<br />

a patrimonial value in time, but I think it will still represent<br />

something to the family where the icon is bestowed on,<br />

to the house in which the icon lives and to the souls for<br />

whom the icon is home.<br />

cb: To an icon, how important is the model?<br />

cc: To an icon, the model is extremely important. Practically,<br />

the condition of the icon’s conservation throughout<br />

time is the model itself. We need a prototype, precisely<br />

because we had an archetype. And this prototype must be<br />

kept, within all of his canonical data.<br />

cb: Do you believe in icons ‘not made by human hands’?<br />

cc: I believe in icons not-made-by-hands. And I also believe<br />

in miracle-working icons. What kind of believer would<br />

I be if I didn’t believe in them?<br />

cb: Can the icon communicate to someone who does not<br />

belong to the Christian culture? Can a man who enters a<br />

church or an exhibition understand the icon, despite not<br />

belonging to the spirit of the religion that hosts the icon?<br />

cc: (stays silent) It is very difficult for someone from a<br />

different faith than the Christian orthodox one (or Christian,<br />

in general), to relate to an icon in the same way, because<br />

he/she does not see and does not feel the same things<br />

Christians see and feel. To that someone, the icon remains

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!