24.07.2013 Views

et illiberalt demokrati - hofhr

et illiberalt demokrati - hofhr

et illiberalt demokrati - hofhr

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

44<br />

støtte politisk uafhængige og kritiske medier, eller i hvert fald ikke havde nogen<br />

systematisk og eksplicit formuler<strong>et</strong> politik på områd<strong>et</strong>, bestyrkes af Slobodan Djuric i<br />

nedenstående citat:<br />

The democratic opposition has not shown the necessary interest in the<br />

position of private RTV stations, nor has it evaluated their significance<br />

with proper attention. When the Coalition Zajedno took over power and<br />

media in 40 cities of Serbia, its interest suddenly declined in removing the<br />

blockade of RTS and in the authorities’ activities in the area of radio<br />

diffusion. Although ANEM and Spektar warned many times in the press<br />

about the distribution of radio frequencies, about the introduction of<br />

repressive conditions for independent stations, about the multiplication<br />

and spreading of pro-regime RTV stations, about concealed pressure and<br />

blackmail, there was almost never any reaction from the democratic<br />

opposition. 48<br />

4.5 Offentlighedens mediesensitivit<strong>et</strong><br />

Selvom krav<strong>et</strong> om pressefrihed var <strong>et</strong> tilbagevendende tema ved de store<br />

demonstrationer i løb<strong>et</strong> af 90erne, er d<strong>et</strong> svært at vurdere graden af mediesensitivit<strong>et</strong> i<br />

offentligheden. Robert Thomas peger på, at da SPS i 1995 annullerede<br />

privatiseringen af Studio B og erklærede den for statens (dvs. SPS’s) ejendom samt<br />

fyrede tyve af de mest kritiske journalister, lykkedes d<strong>et</strong> ikke oppositionen at mobilisere<br />

mere end nogle få hundrede demonstranter i protest mod d<strong>et</strong>te anslag mod<br />

pressefriheden 49.<br />

Derimod var der massiv opbakning blandt i hvert fald Beograds indbyggere til B92, da<br />

myndighederne lukkede denne under anti-regime demonstrationerne i 96/97. D<strong>et</strong> er<br />

helt klart at konkr<strong>et</strong>e begivenheder, som for eksempel store protestdemonstrationer,<br />

øgede behov<strong>et</strong> for og krav<strong>et</strong> om at få adgang til information, især fordi de<br />

regimekontrollerede medier bevidst forsøgte enten fuldstændigt at ignorere sådanne<br />

begivenheder eller fordreje dem.<br />

Men derudover er der ingen tvivl om at fremkomsten af en række medie-NGO’er og<br />

deres kritik af regim<strong>et</strong>s mediestrategier var med til at skærpe offentlighedens<br />

48 Slobdan Djuric citer<strong>et</strong> i rapporten A Media Portrait of Serbia, 2000.<br />

49 Da Studio B var den eneste kritiske tv station var d<strong>et</strong>te træk fra regim<strong>et</strong>s side <strong>et</strong> alvorligt anslag mod d<strong>et</strong><br />

oppositionelle Serbien. Se desuden Robert Thomas 1999:260-61.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!