Second Language Acquisition and Second ... - Stephen Krashen
Second Language Acquisition and Second ... - Stephen Krashen
Second Language Acquisition and Second ... - Stephen Krashen
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
on actual use of routines <strong>and</strong> patterns in adult second language performance. There<br />
is, however, some interesting literature from scholars concerned with materials <strong>and</strong><br />
language pedagogy. Consider the "st<strong>and</strong>ard" audio-lingual technique of first<br />
memorizing a dialogue (as a routine) <strong>and</strong> then working on pattern practice. This is<br />
an implicit version of position 1: the routine is acquired from the dialogue <strong>and</strong> then<br />
broken into patterns for pattern practice, <strong>and</strong> it is suggested that the adult gains<br />
fluency through the use or transfer of these patterns to real conversational contexts.<br />
In other words, routines <strong>and</strong> patterns constitute all of language performance. (This is<br />
certainly not the view of all those scholars who encourage the use of pattern<br />
practice; see, for example, Rivers, 1972, pp. 10-12.)<br />
To be sure, audio-lingual language teaching does result in increased student<br />
proficiency in second language, although other systems seem to be more efficient<br />
(see von Elek <strong>and</strong> Oskarsson, 1973). Does this mean that position 1 is correct? Not<br />
necessarily. It may appear to be the case that routines <strong>and</strong> patterns are being learned<br />
in the classroom <strong>and</strong> used as such in performance. In reality, proficiency gained in<br />
such circumstances is more likely due to the creative construction process, which is<br />
present in both adults <strong>and</strong> children (<strong>Krashen</strong>, 1977b), as well as the learning of<br />
explicit conscious rules (hypothesized to be used only as a Monitor).<br />
First, even meaningless pattern practice may provide some, if less than optimal,<br />
input for the creative construction process. <strong>Second</strong>, such practice may also provide a<br />
domain for conscious rule learning, either as an environment for working out rules<br />
(inductive) or as a place to practice rule application (deductive) <strong>and</strong> to receive<br />
feedback.<br />
The use of routines <strong>and</strong> patterns is certainly a part of language, but it is probably not<br />
a large part. In fact, many second language performers report that it is often quite<br />
difficult to find a spot in a conversation for a routine or pattern learned in a dialogue<br />
(K. Schule, personal communication). In addition, sometimes performers report<br />
having to run through an entire dialogue to get to the appropriate line!<br />
Even if the gestalt mode per se were learned in the audiolingual class, there are<br />
dangers in encouraging adults to use it. The outside world for adults is nowhere near<br />
as predictable as the linguistic environment around Fillmore's children was. The<br />
wide use of routines<br />
98