Second Language Acquisition and Second ... - Stephen Krashen
Second Language Acquisition and Second ... - Stephen Krashen
Second Language Acquisition and Second ... - Stephen Krashen
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>and</strong> often incorporated them into his speech. This is similar to what Clark found in<br />
her study of Adam. Wagner-Gough hypothesizes that patterns do not directly evolve<br />
into creative rule-governed language: "It is quite clear that there is no transfer<br />
between some imitations <strong>and</strong> subsequent free speech patterns. For example, a<br />
learner may say 'My name is Homer' in one breath <strong>and</strong> 'He Fred' in another, the<br />
former being a memorized pattern <strong>and</strong> the latter the learner's own rule" (p. 71).<br />
Thus, Wagner-Gough supports position 2.<br />
The most complete study of routines <strong>and</strong> patterns in child second language<br />
acquisition is L. Fillmore's doctoral dissertation (Fillmore, 1976), an exhaustive<br />
examination of the speech produced by five acquirers of English as a second<br />
language in an English-speaking kindergarten. Unlike Wagner-Gough, Fillmore<br />
comes out strongly for position 3:<br />
... the strategy of acquiring formulaic speech is central to the learning of language:<br />
indeed, it is this step that puts the learner in a position to perform the analysis which<br />
is prerequisite to acquisition. The formulas... constituted the linguistic material on<br />
which a large part of their (the children's) analytical activities could be carried out....<br />
Once they were in the learner's repertory, they became familiar, <strong>and</strong> therefore could<br />
be compared with other utterances in the repertory as well as with those produced by<br />
other speakers (p. 640).<br />
All the children studied by Fillmore used routines <strong>and</strong> patterns very early <strong>and</strong> very<br />
heavily: "The most striking similarity among the spontaneous speech records of the<br />
five children was the acquisition <strong>and</strong> use of formulaic expressions. All five quickly<br />
acquired repertoires of expression which they knew how to use more or less<br />
appropriately, <strong>and</strong> put them to immediate <strong>and</strong> frequent use (p. 640). Including only<br />
the clearest cases of formulaic expressions, Fillmore calculated that their use ranged<br />
from 52 per cent to 100 per cent of the total number of utterances at the early stages,<br />
down to a low of 37 percent in the most advanced performer at the end of the year.<br />
Two children, in fact, remained nearly completely dependent on routines <strong>and</strong><br />
patterns even at the end of the year.<br />
Routines <strong>and</strong> patterns evolved into creative language in a manner not unlike that<br />
reported by R. Clark (1974). Larger units were broken into smaller units, routines<br />
became patterns, <strong>and</strong> parts of patterns were "freed" to recombine with other parts of<br />
patterns. This break-up<br />
93