Second Language Acquisition and Second ... - Stephen Krashen
Second Language Acquisition and Second ... - Stephen Krashen
Second Language Acquisition and Second ... - Stephen Krashen
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
The Good <strong>Language</strong> Learner Revisited<br />
If all the above is true, it predicts that above all the "good language learner" is an<br />
acquirer, who first of all is able to obtain sufficient intake in the second language, <strong>and</strong><br />
second, has a low affective filter to enable him to utilize this input for language<br />
acquisition. The good language learner may or may not be a conscious learner. If he is,<br />
he is an "optimal Monitor user". We would therefore not be surprised to see above<br />
average or superior language aptitude in such a performer.<br />
Data from Naimon et al. (1978) support these generalizations. They surveyed thirty-four<br />
"good language learners", <strong>and</strong> found that immersion <strong>and</strong> motivation were the most<br />
frequent responses to the question of what factors influenced successful second language<br />
acquisition. Further, they reported that "there is some evidence in the interview... that<br />
those subjects who learned a language in the country of the target language, though<br />
frequently combined with self-study, usually acquired it successfully" (p. 34). This<br />
conclusion is similar to that reached by Carroll (1967), in his study of college foreign<br />
language majors, as well as in other studies (<strong>Krashen</strong>, 1976a; Chapter 3, this volume).<br />
The Good <strong>Language</strong> Learners in Naimon et al. (1978) agreed that the study of grammar<br />
alone was not enough: "Several interviewees, who had achieved high marks in their<br />
language courses at school, now attached little significance to this aspect of success" (p.<br />
34).<br />
Thus, the mixture of formal <strong>and</strong> informal experience with the second language appeared<br />
to be the most popular approach. One subject, for example, Mr. ."E", while immersing<br />
himself in the country where the target language was spoken, would study on his own, a<br />
lesson a day in formal grammar.<br />
Good language learners/acquirers must do more than just be present in informal <strong>and</strong><br />
formal environments, however. It appears to be the case that they "go out <strong>and</strong> get" intake<br />
<strong>and</strong> have a low enough filter to utilize it for language acquisition. While many of them<br />
consciously learn (12/34 in Naimon et al. indicated that conscious rules were useful for<br />
them; in Wesche, 1977, 6/11 said the same thing), they appeared to be optimal Monitor<br />
users, using learning as a supplement to acquisition in certain conditions.<br />
37