Second Language Acquisition and Second ... - Stephen Krashen
Second Language Acquisition and Second ... - Stephen Krashen
Second Language Acquisition and Second ... - Stephen Krashen
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
II is obviated by an independently justified model of adult second language competence in which<br />
intake informal environments <strong>and</strong> formal instruction make different sorts of contributions to second<br />
language competence.<br />
Table 3. Linguistic environments relevant to second language<br />
proficiency in adults<br />
_____________________________________________________________________________<br />
In the classroom Outside the classroom<br />
_______________________ ______________________________<br />
"intake"<br />
informal formal<br />
(language "intake" "exposure" (selfuse)<br />
formal informal informal study)<br />
_____________________________________________________________________________<br />
<strong>Acquisition</strong> * *<br />
Learning * *<br />
_____________________________________________________________________________<br />
Table 3 summarizes the implications of the literature survey <strong>and</strong> SLOPE data in terms of Monitor<br />
Theory. Both formal <strong>and</strong> informal linguistic environments contribute to second language proficiency<br />
but do so in different ways: an intensive intake informal environment can provide both the adult <strong>and</strong><br />
child with the necessary input for the operation of the language acquisition device. The classroom<br />
can contribute in two ways: as a formal linguistic environment, providing rule isolation <strong>and</strong><br />
feedback for the development of the Monitor, <strong>and</strong>, to the extent language use is emphasized,<br />
simultaneously as a source of primary linguistic data for language acquisition.<br />
50