20.03.2013 Views

Second Language Acquisition and Second ... - Stephen Krashen

Second Language Acquisition and Second ... - Stephen Krashen

Second Language Acquisition and Second ... - Stephen Krashen

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

hemisphere is removed, <strong>and</strong> the patient is still able to speak, we can assume that the<br />

right hemisphere had at least some part in the language function before the surgery.<br />

The literature indicates that early removal of the left hemisphere for lesions incurred<br />

before age 5 does not generally result in aphasia. This result, like the data from<br />

unilateral lesions ((3) above) implies at least some right hemisphere participation in<br />

the language function in early years (<strong>Krashen</strong>, 1973a; Witelson, 1977).<br />

The hemispherectomy data are clear only up to age 5 (<strong>Krashen</strong>, 1973a), as this<br />

surgical procedure is rarely used with older children.<br />

5. EEG <strong>and</strong> AER. Research using EEG <strong>and</strong> AER techniques suggest that signs of<br />

hemispheric specialization are present even at birth. When infants as young as 2<br />

weeks old are presented with verbal stimuli (e.g. the mother's voice), the auditory<br />

evoked response is greater over the left hemisphere; when musical stimuli are<br />

presented (e.g. a music box), the AER is greater over the right hemisphere (Molfese,<br />

1976). EEG results are similar: we see left-right differences in infants as young as 5<br />

months old (Gardiner <strong>and</strong> Walter, 1976).<br />

6. Some researchers have looked for anatomical differences between the two<br />

hemispheres: slight differences do in fact exist in the adult brain (Geschwind <strong>and</strong><br />

Levitsky, 1968) <strong>and</strong> it has been confirmed that similar left-right morphological<br />

differences exist in the infant <strong>and</strong> even in the pre-natal brain (Witelson <strong>and</strong> Pallie,<br />

1973; Wada, Clarke, <strong>and</strong> Hamm, 1975), suggesting at least the potential of<br />

predisposition for hemispheric specialization.<br />

What can we conclude about the development of cerebral dominance from this array<br />

of reports? We have seen some evidence for "lateralization by zero" (consistent with<br />

EEG, AER, <strong>and</strong> anatomical studies, as well as some dichotic listening studies <strong>and</strong><br />

experiments using unimanual motor skills), some for "lateralization by 5" (clinical<br />

data on brain damage <strong>and</strong> hemispherectomy) <strong>and</strong> some for lateralization by puberty<br />

(dichotic studies using more difficult stimuli). A possible solution is to posit the<br />

following developmental course:<br />

1. Most of us are born with a predisposition for left hemisphere<br />

language, <strong>and</strong> there is thus some specialization right from the start,<br />

enough to be detected by EEG <strong>and</strong> AER, <strong>and</strong> to influence the<br />

development of unimanual motor skills.<br />

75

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!