Second Language Acquisition and Second ... - Stephen Krashen
Second Language Acquisition and Second ... - Stephen Krashen
Second Language Acquisition and Second ... - Stephen Krashen
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Monitor, to exist, <strong>and</strong> the degree to which one has become a formal thinker may<br />
relate to the success one has in formal language learning.<br />
On the other h<strong>and</strong>, formal operations may be at least partly responsible for a<br />
fossilization of progress in subconscious language acquisition. One effect of formal<br />
operations on acquisition may be a result of what can be termed the indirect effects<br />
of formal operations, namely the affective changes that occur in adolescence that<br />
are catalyzed by formal operations. These changes result in the selfconsciousness<br />
<strong>and</strong> feelings of vulnerability often observed in this age group, Elkind (1970) has<br />
argued that formal operations allows one to conceptualize the thoughts of othersthis<br />
leads the adolescent to the false conclusions that others are thinking about him<br />
<strong>and</strong> are focusing on just what he considers to be his inadequacies. Such feeling may<br />
generate at least in part attitudes unfavorable for the successful acquisition of a<br />
second language, which may act to discourage the acquirer from interacting with<br />
primary linguistic data, <strong>and</strong>/or may act to strengthen an "affective filter" (Dulay <strong>and</strong><br />
Burt, 1977) that prevents the acquirer from utilizing all the input he hears for further<br />
language acquisition. (For more detailed discussion, see Chapter 2.)<br />
The available data strongly suggest, however, that subconscious language<br />
acquisition is nevertheless the central means by which adults internalize second<br />
languages, a position supported not only by research but also by the practice of<br />
successful language teachers who emphasize communicative activities in the<br />
classroom (see, for example, Terrell, 1977).<br />
To summarize to this point: Lenneberg's claim that lateralization was complete by<br />
puberty <strong>and</strong> is the neurological basis for the critical period for language acquisition<br />
<strong>and</strong> thus responsible for child-adult differences in second language acquisition is<br />
not entirely ruled out. There is, however, considerable evidence today that implies<br />
that much of the development of cerebral dominance may be complete much earlier<br />
<strong>and</strong> may have little or nothing to do with the critical period. Moreover, there are<br />
other possible "explanations" for the critical period. The one sketched above<br />
maintains that the ability to "acquire" language naturally does not disappear at<br />
puberty, a position that is consistent with current teaching practice.<br />
77