Second Language Acquisition and Second ... - Stephen Krashen
Second Language Acquisition and Second ... - Stephen Krashen
Second Language Acquisition and Second ... - Stephen Krashen
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
of routines <strong>and</strong> patterns provided the basis for syntax, while morphology appeared much later:<br />
In the development of productive structure, the children all seemed to be following<br />
the strategy of working the major constituents first <strong>and</strong> dealing with the grammatical<br />
details later.... The process of gradual analysis by which parts of formulas become<br />
freed from their original frames yields sentence patterns... in the process, some of the<br />
grammatical morphemes <strong>and</strong> processes are unnoticed <strong>and</strong> lost (p. 656).<br />
Fillmore documents many cases of these processes, <strong>and</strong> the interested reader is urged to consult her<br />
forthcoming book. We present here only a single example. Nora, Fillmore's fastest language<br />
acquirer, had these two formulas<br />
(1) I wanna play wi' dese.<br />
(2) I don' wanna do dese.<br />
She then discovered that the constituents following wanna were interchangeable, <strong>and</strong> that she<br />
could say<br />
<strong>and</strong><br />
(3) I don' wanna play dese<br />
(4) I wanna do dese.<br />
She thus acquired the patterns "I wanna VP" <strong>and</strong> "I don' wanna VP". "Play with NP" then became<br />
a formulaic verb phrase unit" which could be used for other slots requiring VP, e.g. "Le's VP", as<br />
in:<br />
(5) Le's play wi' that one.<br />
This "formula-bases analytical process... was repeated in case after case of the children's<br />
spontaneous data" (p. 645). "Rules" came about when all the constituents of a formula were<br />
"freed".<br />
Why did these children follow such a route? This question can be subdivided into several smaller<br />
ones. First, one may ask why so many routines <strong>and</strong> patterns occurred. Fillmore points out that the<br />
linguistic environment of the classroom <strong>and</strong> playground was conducive to the learning of routines<br />
<strong>and</strong> patterns. The daily classroom routine, for example, allowed the acquirers to figure out what<br />
was being said easily--all teachers followed, to a larger extent, predictable routines. "Such<br />
language, because it is used daily <strong>and</strong> with only minor variation, becomes highly predictable. The<br />
children can figure out<br />
94