Second Language Acquisition and Second ... - Stephen Krashen
Second Language Acquisition and Second ... - Stephen Krashen
Second Language Acquisition and Second ... - Stephen Krashen
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Caretaker Speech <strong>and</strong> <strong>Language</strong> <strong>Acquisition</strong><br />
A great deal of current literature confirms that the speech directed to children<br />
acquiring first languages is different from adult native speaker-native speaker<br />
speech. It is known to be composed of shorter sentences, it is more intelligible,<br />
contains utterances that are more well formed, with less subordination, has a more<br />
restricted vocabulary, <strong>and</strong> refers to a more restricted range of topics (i.e. the "here<br />
<strong>and</strong> now"), among other features. Of course, "the finding that mother-ese exists<br />
cannot by itself show that it influences language growth" (Newport, Gleitman, <strong>and</strong><br />
Gleitman, 1977; p. 112). If caretaker speech does help, or "catalyze" language<br />
acquisition, it may do so by supplying crucial input, what the child needs at that<br />
moment, without the distraction of excess noise, or language the child does not<br />
underst<strong>and</strong>. The following section exp<strong>and</strong>s on this point in more detail. I present<br />
first three "facts" about child language acquisition <strong>and</strong> caretaker speech, followed<br />
by a personal interpretation as to how <strong>and</strong> why caretaker speech might be effective.<br />
Following this, we explore the question of whether the simple codes the second<br />
language performer might encounter work the same way.<br />
Here are the three "facts". First, it is by now a well-established finding that<br />
structures are acquired in a relatively predictable order for children acquiring a<br />
given language (for English, see Brown, 1973; Klima <strong>and</strong> Bellugi, 1966; <strong>and</strong> the<br />
excellent review in Clark <strong>and</strong> Clark, 1977). This is not to say that order of<br />
acquisition is absolutely invariant, that children will acquire all grammatical<br />
structures in a strict linear order; rather, there are clear tendencies <strong>and</strong> one can talk<br />
about an "average" order of acquisition.<br />
Another finding relevant to our discussion deals with the relationships between the<br />
complexity of structure in parental input <strong>and</strong> the child's current linguistic level.<br />
While caretaker speech is typically simpler than native speaker-native speaker<br />
speech, it is not "finely tuned" to the child's growing competence. According to<br />
studies by Newport et al. (1977) <strong>and</strong> Cross (1977), the syntactic complexity of<br />
caretaker speech does not grow in exact proportion to the child's competence.<br />
Caretaker speech, however, may be "roughly tuned" to the child's level: we see<br />
positive, but not always significant,<br />
125