Second Language Acquisition and Second ... - Stephen Krashen
Second Language Acquisition and Second ... - Stephen Krashen
Second Language Acquisition and Second ... - Stephen Krashen
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
not exist <strong>and</strong> performers rely solely on patterns <strong>and</strong> routine to<br />
communicate.<br />
2. Prefabricated routines may evolve into patterns, but at the same time,<br />
independently, the creative construction process develops. This<br />
implies that in some situations propositional language may "catch up"<br />
with automatic speech--that is, the language acquisition process may<br />
"reanalyze" patterns <strong>and</strong> routines as creative constructions.<br />
3. Prefabricated routines may evolve into prefabricated patterns (as in<br />
position 1) <strong>and</strong> these patterns may evolve directly into creative<br />
language. In other words routines <strong>and</strong> patterns may be ingredients of<br />
the creative process.<br />
The following sections will briefly review the literature on routine <strong>and</strong> patterns in<br />
neurolinguistics, child first language acquisition, child second language acquisition, <strong>and</strong> adult<br />
second language. We interpret this literature as fully consistent with only position 2.<br />
Neurolinguistic Status of Automatic Speech<br />
Van Lancker (1972, p.25) defines automatic speech as "conventional greetings, overused <strong>and</strong><br />
overlearned expressions (such as 'be careful' <strong>and</strong> 'first things first'), pause fillers such as 'you<br />
know' <strong>and</strong> 'well', certain idioms, swearing, <strong>and</strong> other emotional language, perhaps stereotyped<br />
questions <strong>and</strong> answers, comm<strong>and</strong>s, ...". Automatic speech (AS) thus appears to share some of<br />
the characteristics of routines <strong>and</strong> patterns.<br />
The most striking neurolinguistic fact about automatic speech is that AS, as contrasted with<br />
propositional language, which is lateralized to the left hemisphere (see <strong>Krashen</strong>, 1976b, for a<br />
review), may be represented in both sides of the brain. That is, automatic speech is localized<br />
in both the right <strong>and</strong> left cerebral hemispheres.<br />
The primary evidence for this is the fact that routines <strong>and</strong> patterns are often preserved in case<br />
of nonfluent (syntactic) aphasia <strong>and</strong> after left hemispherectomy. Patients who have suffered<br />
left brain damage, who have lost the ability to speak, can often use automatic speech, as can<br />
those who have undergone removal of the left hemisphere during<br />
84