20.03.2013 Views

Second Language Acquisition and Second ... - Stephen Krashen

Second Language Acquisition and Second ... - Stephen Krashen

Second Language Acquisition and Second ... - Stephen Krashen

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

not exist <strong>and</strong> performers rely solely on patterns <strong>and</strong> routine to<br />

communicate.<br />

2. Prefabricated routines may evolve into patterns, but at the same time,<br />

independently, the creative construction process develops. This<br />

implies that in some situations propositional language may "catch up"<br />

with automatic speech--that is, the language acquisition process may<br />

"reanalyze" patterns <strong>and</strong> routines as creative constructions.<br />

3. Prefabricated routines may evolve into prefabricated patterns (as in<br />

position 1) <strong>and</strong> these patterns may evolve directly into creative<br />

language. In other words routines <strong>and</strong> patterns may be ingredients of<br />

the creative process.<br />

The following sections will briefly review the literature on routine <strong>and</strong> patterns in<br />

neurolinguistics, child first language acquisition, child second language acquisition, <strong>and</strong> adult<br />

second language. We interpret this literature as fully consistent with only position 2.<br />

Neurolinguistic Status of Automatic Speech<br />

Van Lancker (1972, p.25) defines automatic speech as "conventional greetings, overused <strong>and</strong><br />

overlearned expressions (such as 'be careful' <strong>and</strong> 'first things first'), pause fillers such as 'you<br />

know' <strong>and</strong> 'well', certain idioms, swearing, <strong>and</strong> other emotional language, perhaps stereotyped<br />

questions <strong>and</strong> answers, comm<strong>and</strong>s, ...". Automatic speech (AS) thus appears to share some of<br />

the characteristics of routines <strong>and</strong> patterns.<br />

The most striking neurolinguistic fact about automatic speech is that AS, as contrasted with<br />

propositional language, which is lateralized to the left hemisphere (see <strong>Krashen</strong>, 1976b, for a<br />

review), may be represented in both sides of the brain. That is, automatic speech is localized<br />

in both the right <strong>and</strong> left cerebral hemispheres.<br />

The primary evidence for this is the fact that routines <strong>and</strong> patterns are often preserved in case<br />

of nonfluent (syntactic) aphasia <strong>and</strong> after left hemispherectomy. Patients who have suffered<br />

left brain damage, who have lost the ability to speak, can often use automatic speech, as can<br />

those who have undergone removal of the left hemisphere during<br />

84

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!