17.06.2013 Views

Untitled

Untitled

Untitled

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

112 Chapter 2<br />

guessed. The educated guess is surely that he must have had some<br />

influence because of his great status, but could not have worked a<br />

transformation on his own. However that may be, there is a good<br />

deal of evidence that the ‘forbidden degrees’ loophole was no longer<br />

a popular escape route from marriage in the fourteenth century, in<br />

the areas where ecclesiastical court record evidence has survived<br />

and has been studied.<br />

Records of real cases from local church courts<br />

Most of the evidence survives (or is known to survive) in England,<br />

and the English evidence for marriage litigation has been the subject<br />

of several fine studies. It is worth quoting some of the conclusions:<br />

Helmholz: ‘It is all but irresistible to conclude that divorces were<br />

often procured under the system of kinship disqualification. The<br />

Church court records, however, do not support that conclusion.<br />

The hard fact is that there were few divorces on these grounds.’<br />

Helmholz provides various explanations: people tried to avoid marrying<br />

kin, they looked for wives outside their community, forbidden<br />

degrees were hard to prove under the tough conditions of evidence<br />

(ibid. 79–85).<br />

Sheehan (writing about a late fourteenth-century Ely consistory<br />

court register): ‘the court’s principal activity was the vindication<br />

and defence of the marriage bond; pleas of annulment occurred<br />

infrequently’; ‘It becomes evident that marriages were not especially<br />

threatened by impediments of consanguinity and anity’<br />

(ibid. 75); ‘the court was primarily a body for the proof and defence<br />

of marriage rather than an instrument of easy annulment’ (ibid. 76).<br />

Ingram:<br />

Today the bulk of matrimonial litigation . . . relates to divorce. In late<br />

medieval and early modern England the situation was very di·erent. It is<br />

true that, although legal divorce in the modern sense was unknown, it was<br />

possible on rigorously specified grounds to bring actions for the annulment<br />

of marriage or for separation from bed and board. However, all the available<br />

evidence indicates that, throughout the period from the fourteenth to<br />

Helmholz, Marriage Litigation in Medieval England, 79.<br />

M. M. Sheehan, ‘The Formation and Stability of Marriage in Fourteenth-<br />

Century England: Evidence of an Ely Register’ (1971), repr. in id., Marriage, Family,<br />

and Law in Medieval Europe: Collected Studies, ed. J. K. Farge (Cardi·, 1996), 38–76<br />

at 74.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!