17.06.2013 Views

Untitled

Untitled

Untitled

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

70 Chapter 1<br />

Again, if marriage had been evil, the Lord would have taught that it is<br />

evil, nor would he have honoured it with his presence, nor eaten there, nor<br />

adorned it with so solemn a miracle, nor permitted his most holy mother<br />

to be present. Therefore in honouring a marriage with all these things, he<br />

showed that it was good.<br />

Again, the canon says, and this is self-evident, that the error which is not<br />

resisted is approved, nor is a man who abandons the e·ort to resist a public<br />

wrong immune from suspicion of being secretly involved. Therefore, if<br />

marriage were evil, since the Lord was present at it, and did not resist that<br />

evil when it would have been possible for him to do so, and did confute it<br />

when he was the teacher of truth, in failing to obstruct evil, he approves it.<br />

But this is utterly impossible. Therefore so is the first point, namely, that<br />

marriage is evil. (Servasanto da Faenza: Document 1. 11. 12–13)<br />

The miracle at Cana<br />

Christ’s endorsement of marriage is also demonstrated by the miracle<br />

worked at the wedding feast.<br />

Against the background of all these topoi, one or two preachers<br />

stand out for their more original or sophisticated apologias for<br />

marriage. Aldobrandino da Toscanella is unusual for his time in<br />

asserting that it confers grace. Until some point in the thirteenth<br />

century there was no consensus that marriage actually did confer<br />

grace: many thought that it was the one sacrament that did not.<br />

By the second half of the thirteenth century the conviction that<br />

Christian marriage conferred grace had more or less won the day.<br />

However, it should not surprise us that preaching lagged behind<br />

theological development. Aldobrandinoda Toscanella, though, had<br />

apparently been keeping up with academic theology. He puts it<br />

like this:<br />

Again . . . in marriage grace is conferred. In so far as it is contracted in<br />

the faith of Christ, it has the power to confer the grace which helps with<br />

doing those works which are required in marriage. And we see an example<br />

of this in the field of natural philosophy, for whenever the power of doing<br />

something is given to anything, helps are also provided by means of which<br />

D’Avray, Medieval Marriage Sermons: Hugues de Saint-Cher, para. 1; Pierre<br />

de Saint-Beno^§t, para. 1; Guibert de Tournai, para. 1; Jean Halgrin: Document 1.<br />

9. 1; Konrad Holtnicker: Document 1. 10. 6; Servasanto da Faenza: Document 1.<br />

11. 12.<br />

D’Avray, ‘The Gospel of the Marriage Feast of Cana and Marriage Preaching<br />

in France’, 149, citing D. Burr, The Persecution of Peter Olivi (Transactions of the<br />

American Philosophical Society, ns 66, pt. 5; Philadelphia, 1976), 45–6.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!