17.06.2013 Views

Untitled

Untitled

Untitled

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

4<br />

Consummation<br />

(a) Consummation and the Medieval Church’s Idea of Sex<br />

Bigamy and consummation<br />

A consummated marriage symbolizes the union of Christ and the<br />

Church, an unconsummated one only the union of God with the just<br />

soul. So if a woman marries a man but never has sexual intercourse<br />

with him, and then after his death marries another man and does<br />

sleep with him, her flesh has not been divided: she is uniquely his<br />

in flesh and he uniquely hers. Thus the symbolism of the sacrament<br />

of marriage is not defective, so if she dies, the man is no ‘bigamist’<br />

and may become a priest. That is Innocent III’s argument in the<br />

decretal Debitum.<br />

Similar reasoning could a·ect the fate of married clerics in minor<br />

orders. ‘Bigamy’ would normally lose them clerical status and<br />

immunity, but if the wife’s previous marriage had not been consummated<br />

(or, according to a strict interpretation, if she had never lost<br />

her virginity), there was no problem. The man remained a cleric,<br />

out of reach of secular criminal justice.<br />

The historian of clerical privilege in France has studied practical<br />

consequences in concrete cases. There was a cleric named Imbert<br />

who had been put in a secular prison. The archbishop of Lyons<br />

demanded that he be surrendered. The royal procurator objected<br />

that he was a ‘bigamist’. The archbishop replied that Imbert’s wife<br />

had not been married before, or that if she had, the marriage had<br />

never been consummated. The procurator still thought that the<br />

presumption of law was against Imbert, and it may have been to<br />

avoid such an argument that another cleric called Perrin took an<br />

extreme precaution. Since the friends of the girl he planned to<br />

X. 1. 21. 5.<br />

I follow R. G‹enestal, Le Privilegium fori en France du d‹ecret de Gratien ›alafindu<br />

XIVe si›ecle (2 vols.; Biblioth›eque de l’ ‹Ecole des hautes ‹etudes, Sciences religieuses,<br />

35, 39; Paris, 1921–4), i. 73–4.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!