17.06.2013 Views

Untitled

Untitled

Untitled

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

22 Chapter 1<br />

lar preaching. (He concentrates on the Carolingian period, but<br />

casts an eye back to earlier preaching.) His doctoral thesis on early<br />

medieval preaching unfortunately remains unpublished, but some<br />

of the findings have appeared in print as articles. He has identified<br />

‘over nine hundred sermons written or adapted by Carolingian<br />

authors as sources of popular preaching in the period<br />

750–950’. One collection has been properly edited in a modern<br />

edition: I shall refer to this by the name of its editor, Mercier.<br />

Three more are in Migne’s Patrologia Latina and easy to consult.<br />

Other popular Carolingian homiliaries have been studied in<br />

articles by three specialists whose work has changed our understanding<br />

of homiliaries: Barr‹e, Bouhot, and ‹Etaix. Yet another<br />

article argues that the homilies on the Gospels of Gregory the<br />

Great were widely used for popular preaching in the early Middle<br />

Ages.<br />

Marriage symbolism in early medieval popular preaching: a<br />

significant absence<br />

This is not sucient to show that marriage symbolism reached the<br />

people via the pulpit. We still need to ask how regularly marriage<br />

symbolism appeared in these sermons, and how many ordinary<br />

priests actually used the sermons Amos has studied. Even assuming<br />

that a non-trivial number of priests had reasonable Latin and<br />

a homiliary of the right level for their needs, a problem to which<br />

we must return, how much about marriage and marriage symbolism<br />

would it contain? My provisional verdict is that there was<br />

relatively little preaching about marriage symbolism in the Carolingian<br />

period. This is based mainly on a search for sermons on<br />

the Gospel reading of the marriage feast of Cana, which would<br />

‘The Origin and Nature of the Carolingian Sermon’ (unpublished Ph.D. dissertation,<br />

Michigan State University, 1983). I have used this important thesis extensively:<br />

it led me to most of those sermons/homiliaries discussed below which Amos<br />

does not discuss in print.<br />

T. L. Amos, ‘Preaching and the Sermon in the Carolingian World’, in T. L.<br />

Amos, E. A. Green, and B. M. Kienzle (eds.), De ore Domini: Preacher and Word in<br />

the Middle Ages (Kalamazoo, 1989), 41–60 at 47.<br />

XIV hom‹elies du IXe si›ecle de l’Italie du Nord, ed. P. Mercier (Sources chr‹etiennes,<br />

161; Paris, 1970).<br />

Amos, ‘Preaching and the Sermon in the Carolingian World’, 57 n. 31, for<br />

bibliography.<br />

P. A. DeLeeuw, ‘Gregory the Great’s “Homilies on the Gospels” in the Early<br />

Middle Ages’, Studi medievali, 3rd ser., 26 (1985), 855–69.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!