Bibliography 301 Krueger, r. l., ‘Questions of Gender in Old French Romance’, in ead. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Medieval Romance, 132–49. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Medieval Romance (Cambridge, 2000). Kuhrt, a., ‘Babylon’, in E. J. Bakker, I. J. F. De Jong, and H. van Wees (eds.), Brill’s Companion to Herodotus (Leiden etc., 2002), 475–96. Kuiters, r., ‘Saint Augustin et l’indissolubilit‹e du mariage’, Augustiniana, 9 (1959), 5–11. Kuttner, s., ‘Pope Lucius III and the Bigamous Archbishop of Palermo’ (1961); repr. in id., The History of Ideas and Doctrines of Canon Law in the Middle Ages (London, 1980), no. vii, pp. 409–53. Repertorium der Kanonistik (1140–1234): Prodromos Corporis glossarum, i (Studi e testi, 71; Vatican City, 1937). labriolle: see de Labriolle. landau, P.,withPetzolt, m. (eds.), De iure canonico medii aevi: Festschrift f•ur Rudolf Weigand (Studia Gratiana, 27; Rome, 1996). lawrence, r. J., The Sacramental Interpretation of Ephesians 5: 32 from Peter Lombard to the Council of Trent (The Catholic University of America Studies in Sacred Theology, Second Series, 145; Washington, 1963). lea, H. ¢., History of Sacerdotal Celibacy in the Christian Church, 3rd rev. edn. (2 vols.; London, 1907). le bras, G., ‘Mariage. III. La doctrine du mariage chez les th‹eologiens et canonistes depuis l’an mille’, in Dictionnaire de th‹eologie catholique (15 vols. excluding indexes; Paris, 1899–1950), ix (1926), 2123–223. lebuin, Saint: see The Anglo-Saxon Missionaries in Germany. leclercq, J., ‘Pr‹eface’ to R. Gr‹egoire, Les Hom‹eliaires du Moyen A^ge: inventaire et analyse des manuscrits (Rerum Ecclesiasticarum Documenta, series maior, 6; Rome, 1966). Monks and Love in Twelfth-Century France: Psycho-Historical Essays (Oxford, 1979). Le Mariage vu par les moines au XIIe si›ecle (Paris, 1983). leick, G., Sex and Eroticism in Mesopotamian Literature (London etc., 1994). le Jan, r., Famille et pouvoir dans le monde franc (VIIe–Xe si›ecle): essai d’anthropologie sociale (Paris, 1995). leoba, Saint: see The Anglo-Saxon Missionaries in Germany. lerner, r., review of d’Avray, Medieval Marriage Sermons, inSpeculum, 79 (2004), 163–5. levison, fi., ‘Eine Predigt des Lupus von Ferrieres’, in id., Aus rheinischer und fr•ankischer Fr•uhzeit (D•usseldorf, 1947), 561–4 [not seen, but the sermon is in MS BL Royal 8. B. XIV, fos. 131V–133V]. leyser, H., Medieval Women: A Social History of Women in England 450– 1500 (London, 1995).
302 Bibliography liotta, F., ‘Burgundione’, in Dizionario biografico degli italiani,xv(Rome, 1972), 423–8. lombardi, d., Matrimoni di antico regime (Annali dell’Istituto storico italo-germanico in Trento, Monografie, 34; Bologna, 2001). luscombe, d., ‘From Paris to the Paraclete: The Correspondence of Abelard and Heloise’, Proceedings of the British Academy, 74 (1988), 247–83. lutterbach, H., Sexualit•at im Mittelalter: Eine Kulturstudie anhand von Bu¢b•uchern des 6. bis 12. Jahrhunderts (Cologne etc., 1999). mabille, m., ‘Les manuscrits de Jean d’Essomes conserv‹es ›a laBiblioth›eque Nationale de Paris’, Biblioth›eque de l’ ‹Ecole des Chartes, 130 (1972), 231–4. maccarrone, m., ‘Sacramentalit›a e indissolubilit›a del matrimonio nella dottrina di Innocenzo III’, Lateranum, 44 (1978), 449–514. macFarlane, a., Marriage and Love in England, 1300–1840: Modes of Reproduction (Oxford, 1986). mclaughlin, r. e., ‘The Word Eclipsed: Preaching in the Early Middle Ages’, Traditio, 46 (1991), 77–122. mcⁿamara, J.-a., andfiemple, s. F., ‘Marriage and Divorce in the Frankish Kingdom’, in S. M. Stuard (ed.), Women in Medieval Society (Philadelphia, 1976), 96–124. Manuale ad usum percelebris Ecclesie Sarisburiensis: From the Edition Printed at Rouen in 1543 . . ., ed. A. J. Collins (Henry Bradshaw Society, 91; London, 1960). marculf, St:Marculfi formularum libri duo, ed. A. Uddholm (Collectio Scriptorum Veterum Uppsaliensis; Uppsala, 1962). marglin, F. a., ‘Types of Sexual Union and their Implicit Meanings’, in Hawley and Wul·, The Divine Consort, 298–315. Il matrimonio nella societ›a altomedievale (Settimane di Studio del Centro Italiano di Studi sull’alto Medioevo, 24; 2 vols.; Spoleto, 1977). matter, e. a., The Voice of my Beloved: The Song of Songs in Western Medieval Christianity (Philadelphia, c.1990). mechtild of magdeburg, The Flowing Light of the Godhead, trans. and intro. F. Tobin (New York etc., 1998). meek, ¢., ‘“Simone ha aderito alla fede di Maometto”: la “fornicazione spirituale” come causa di separazione (Lucca 1424)’, in Menchi and Quaglioni, Coniugi nemici, 121–39. menchi, s. s.,andQuaglioni, d., Coniugi nemici: i processi matrimoniali. La separazione in Italia dal XII al XVIII secolo (I processi matrimoniali degli archivi ecclesiastici italiani, 1; Annali dell’Istituto storico italogermanico in Trento, Quaderni, 53; Bologna, 2000). mercier, P.: seeXIV hom‹elies. ministe›re de l’e‹ducation nationale, Catalogue g‹en‹eral des manuscrits
- Page 2 and 3:
MEDIEVAL MARRIAGE
- Page 4 and 5:
Medieval Marriage Symbolism and So
- Page 6 and 7:
UXORI CARISSIMAE
- Page 8 and 9:
Acknowledgements The following are
- Page 10 and 11:
Contents Note on Transcriptions xii
- Page 12 and 13:
Contents xi 3. 9. Passage on bigamy
- Page 14 and 15:
Introduction How the modern intelle
- Page 16 and 17:
Introduction 3 ordinary men and wom
- Page 18 and 19:
Introduction 5 role of these gopis
- Page 20 and 21:
Introduction 7 bride, notably—but
- Page 22 and 23:
Introduction 9 world of rational sp
- Page 24 and 25:
Introduction 11 Clairvaux has also
- Page 26 and 27:
Introduction 13 pulse of his time
- Page 28 and 29:
Introduction 15 tive view of marria
- Page 30 and 31:
Introduction 17 symbolism, and to G
- Page 32 and 33:
1 Mass Communication (a) Preliminar
- Page 34 and 35:
Mass Communication 21 after Epiphan
- Page 36 and 37:
Mass Communication 23 be a powerful
- Page 38 and 39:
Mass Communication 25 probably not
- Page 40 and 41:
Mass Communication 27 intended for
- Page 42 and 43:
Mass Communication 29 å the sermon
- Page 44 and 45:
Mass Communication 31 gine that thi
- Page 46 and 47:
Mass Communication 33 invited to th
- Page 48 and 49:
Mass Communication 35 sermons inten
- Page 50 and 51:
Mass Communication 37 tably few fro
- Page 52 and 53:
Mass Communication 39 actly, and al
- Page 54 and 55:
Mass Communication 41 Dominican lib
- Page 56 and 57:
Mass Communication 43 perhaps becau
- Page 58 and 59:
Mass Communication 45 how few manus
- Page 60 and 61:
Mass Communication 47 Books without
- Page 62 and 63:
Mass Communication 49 ties tended t
- Page 64 and 65:
Mass Communication 51 likely that a
- Page 66 and 67:
Mass Communication 53 house or prov
- Page 68 and 69:
Mass Communication 55 at home with
- Page 70 and 71:
Mass Communication 57 codex is a ma
- Page 72 and 73:
Mass Communication 59 calls this ev
- Page 74 and 75:
Mass Communication 61 The preachers
- Page 76 and 77:
Mass Communication 63 topos. G‹er
- Page 78 and 79:
Mass Communication 65 symbolism whi
- Page 80 and 81:
Mass Communication 67 the norms of
- Page 82 and 83:
Mass Communication 69 etc. Probably
- Page 84 and 85:
Mass Communication 71 those things
- Page 86 and 87:
Mass Communication 73 has to be pro
- Page 88 and 89:
Indissolubility 75 there were even
- Page 90 and 91:
Indissolubility 77 A strikingly sim
- Page 92 and 93:
Indissolubility 79 lation of church
- Page 94 and 95:
Indissolubility 81 and full bigamy
- Page 96 and 97:
Indissolubility 83 of course fit th
- Page 98 and 99:
Indissolubility 85 so at all. One c
- Page 100 and 101:
Indissolubility 87 making it work t
- Page 102 and 103:
Indissolubility 89 High-caste marri
- Page 104 and 105:
Indissolubility 91 anyone who recei
- Page 106 and 107:
Indissolubility 93 the message may
- Page 108 and 109:
Indissolubility 95 gree’ laws. Th
- Page 110 and 111:
Indissolubility 97 Rome; I bared my
- Page 112 and 113:
Indissolubility 99 view he expresse
- Page 114 and 115:
Indissolubility 101 We see symbolic
- Page 116 and 117:
Indissolubility 103 stronger than a
- Page 118 and 119:
Indissolubility 105 The change in t
- Page 120 and 121:
Indissolubility 107 problems of pro
- Page 122 and 123:
Indissolubility 109 we solemnly ent
- Page 124 and 125:
Indissolubility 111 marriages shoul
- Page 126 and 127:
Indissolubility 113 the seventeenth
- Page 128 and 129:
Indissolubility 115 are probably lo
- Page 130 and 131:
Indissolubility 117 On the contrary
- Page 132 and 133:
Indissolubility 119 case was an act
- Page 134 and 135:
Indissolubility 121 these alleged s
- Page 136 and 137:
Indissolubility 123 Legal separatio
- Page 138 and 139:
Indissolubility 125 strong, free, i
- Page 140 and 141:
Indissolubility 127 the man and the
- Page 142 and 143:
Indissolubility 129 A similar formu
- Page 144 and 145:
3 Bigamy (a) Bigamy and Becoming a
- Page 146 and 147:
Bigamy 133 necessary but not sucien
- Page 148 and 149:
Bigamy 135 liberty: let her marry w
- Page 150 and 151:
Bigamy 137 elevated to the priestho
- Page 152 and 153:
Bigamy 139 pal oce has been thoroug
- Page 154 and 155:
Bigamy 141 is marriage symbolism th
- Page 156 and 157:
Bigamy 143 riages are celebrated ab
- Page 158 and 159:
Bigamy 145 the nuptial blessing was
- Page 160 and 161:
Bigamy 147 Now the main arguments f
- Page 162 and 163:
Bigamy 149 tury there were classic
- Page 164 and 165:
Bigamy 151 ceremony could be omitte
- Page 166 and 167:
Bigamy 153 Textually, however, the
- Page 168 and 169:
Bigamy 155 Debitum of Innocent III,
- Page 170 and 171:
Bigamy 157 at parish level rather t
- Page 172 and 173:
Bigamy 159 This first point about m
- Page 174 and 175:
Bigamy 161 cleric at the same time
- Page 176 and 177:
Bigamy 163 son Edward II, printed b
- Page 178 and 179:
Bigamy 165 Advantages beyond ‘ben
- Page 180 and 181:
Bigamy 167 Both these cases are fro
- Page 182 and 183:
Consummation 169 marry told him tha
- Page 184 and 185:
Consummation 171 Consummation in ma
- Page 186 and 187:
Consummation 173 a non-consummated
- Page 188 and 189:
The implications of Alexander III
- Page 190 and 191:
Consummation 177 Pope Leo I A key t
- Page 192 and 193:
Consummation 179 Gaudemet shows tha
- Page 194 and 195:
Consummation 181 to put pressure on
- Page 196 and 197:
Consummation 183 sent were exchange
- Page 198 and 199:
Consummation 185 Stephen from him,
- Page 200 and 201:
Consummation 187 consent’ had rem
- Page 202 and 203:
Consummation 189 debate led to no p
- Page 204 and 205:
Consummation 191 she may have stopp
- Page 206 and 207:
Consummation 193 tionalit•at: the
- Page 208 and 209:
Consummation 195 consummation with
- Page 210 and 211:
Consummation 197 can be dissolved b
- Page 212 and 213:
Consummation 199 argument, the inte
- Page 214 and 215:
Conclusion 201 of Reims lay behind
- Page 216 and 217:
Conclusion 203 influenced Alexander
- Page 218 and 219:
Conclusion 205 to take a less toler
- Page 220 and 221:
Conclusion 207 Always a strong imag
- Page 222 and 223:
Documents: 1. 1 209 sponsae’. Hae
- Page 224 and 225:
Documents: 1. 2 211 1. 2. Homily on
- Page 226 and 227:
Documents: 1. 2 213 hydriae primae
- Page 228 and 229:
Documents: 1. 3 215 orthography and
- Page 230 and 231:
Documents: 1. 4 217 1. 4. Nonconfor
- Page 232 and 233:
Documents: 1. 8 219 1. 8. Nonconfor
- Page 234 and 235:
Documents: 1. 9 221 hystriones. Sed
- Page 236 and 237:
Documents: 1. 9 223 peccatum, consu
- Page 238 and 239:
Documents: 1. 10 225 catrix filia e
- Page 240 and 241:
Documents: 1. 11 227 top sliced o·
- Page 242 and 243:
Documents: 1. 11 229 matrem et adhe
- Page 244 and 245:
Documents: 1. 11 231 supple, a cons
- Page 246 and 247:
Documents: 1. 12 233 Secundum est c
- Page 248 and 249:
Documents: 1. 12 235 bona sine aliq
- Page 250 and 251:
Documents: 1. 12 237 contrarium des
- Page 252 and 253:
Documents: 1. 13 239 [fo. 45vb] con
- Page 254 and 255:
Documents: 1. 13 241 quam fores, et
- Page 256 and 257:
Documents: 2. 1 243 it is faded and
- Page 258 and 259:
Documents: 2. 1 245 cimum, utrum vi
- Page 260 and 261:
Documents: 2. 2 247 have been withi
- Page 262 and 263:
Documents: 2. 2 249 ad maiorem conf
- Page 264 and 265: Documents: 3. 2 251 clericaliter, e
- Page 266 and 267: Documents: 3. 3 253 promoveri potes
- Page 268 and 269: Paris, Archives Nationales J 709, n
- Page 270 and 271: Documents: 3. 8 257 4. Dicunt autem
- Page 272 and 273: Documents: 3. 8 259 masculum et fem
- Page 274 and 275: Documents: 3. 8 261 21. Alia ratio
- Page 276 and 277: MS London, BL Royal 11. B. X Docume
- Page 278 and 279: Documents: 3. 9 265 bentes introitu
- Page 280 and 281: Documents: 3. 10 267 iustitiariis e
- Page 282 and 283: Documents: 3. 12 269 3. 12. The cas
- Page 284 and 285: Documents: 4. 1 271 (=O) is the ear
- Page 286 and 287: Documents: 4. 1 273 [Extract edited
- Page 288 and 289: Documents: 4. 2 275 coniugatorum’
- Page 290 and 291: Documents: 4. 4 277 the Camera Apos
- Page 292 and 293: Fos. 29RA-30RA, from the letters as
- Page 294 and 295: Documents: 4. 4 281 Urso comiti Ang
- Page 296 and 297: Documents: 4. 6 283 4. 6. Johannes
- Page 298 and 299: Documents: 4. 7 285 4. 7. A case fr
- Page 300 and 301: Penitenzieria Apostolica Register v
- Page 302 and 303: Bibliography 289 Aristotle’s Mete
- Page 304 and 305: Bibliography 291 The Blickling Homi
- Page 306 and 307: Bibliography 293 s‹eparation?’,
- Page 308 and 309: Bibliography 295 donahue, ¢., Jr.,
- Page 310 and 311: Bibliography 297 ‘Le symbolisme d
- Page 312 and 313: Bibliography 299 Herde, P., Audient
- Page 316 and 317: Bibliography 303 des biblioth›equ
- Page 318 and 319: Bibliography 305 Pfaff, ff., ‘Das
- Page 320 and 321: Bibliography 307 von Eschenbach (Ge
- Page 322 and 323: Bibliography 309 (1916-20); repr. i
- Page 324 and 325: Vatican City, Biblioteca Apostolica
- Page 326 and 327: Barellus, Raymund 109-10, 119 Barr
- Page 328 and 329: Dolezalek, G. 127 n. 147 Dominicans
- Page 330 and 331: instrumental rationality 132, 192-5
- Page 332 and 333: Nelson, J. L. 82 n. 27, 83 n. 28, 8
- Page 334 and 335: small manuscripts, disproportionate