11.10.2012 Views

the-bible-and-the-dead-sea-scrolls

the-bible-and-the-dead-sea-scrolls

the-bible-and-the-dead-sea-scrolls

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

166 IMPACT OF QUMRAN TEXTS ON PAULINE THEOLOGY<br />

is doubtful, 39 fragment 3 2.6 (partly in 4QFestival Prayers c [=<br />

4Q pap509] 40 frags. 97–98 1.8): “And you renewed your covenant for<br />

<strong>the</strong>m” (Mhl KtyXrb #dxtw) (it refers to ancient Israel, because <strong>the</strong> context<br />

speaks of <strong>the</strong> election “from all nations”). 41<br />

Explanations<br />

The tradition of <strong>the</strong> Lord’s supper in 1 Cor 11:25 states that through<br />

<strong>the</strong> covenant sacrifice of Christ’s death, God made a “new covenant”<br />

(apparently according to Jer 31:31 [38:31 LXX] as in CD; quoted later<br />

than Paul in Heb 8:8). Paul himself employs <strong>the</strong> term only once in 2<br />

Cor 3:6; it is ra<strong>the</strong>r un-Jewish to put <strong>the</strong> “new covenant” in sharp opposition<br />

to <strong>the</strong> “old” one (3:14) at Sinai (but see Jer 31:32 [38:32 LXX]).<br />

This difference (a real new covenant or only a renewed covenant)<br />

makes <strong>the</strong> parallel <strong>the</strong>ologically interesting <strong>and</strong> aids a better underst<strong>and</strong>ing<br />

of Paul <strong>and</strong> Qumran. 42 Several times <strong>the</strong> Damascus Document<br />

speaks of a “new covenant” that God made in “<strong>the</strong> l<strong>and</strong> of Damascus”<br />

(whatever “Damascus” means); it seems that this group of <strong>the</strong> “new<br />

covenant” existed already before <strong>the</strong> Qumran community proper was<br />

founded. 43 The same group is apparently meant in 1QpHab 2.3. 44 All<br />

this could mean that <strong>the</strong> Qumran community did not use <strong>the</strong> phrase to<br />

denote itself. 45<br />

39. Cf. James R. Davila, Liturgical Works (ECDSS 6; Gr<strong>and</strong> Rapids: Eerdmans,<br />

2000), 17.<br />

40. The same composition as 1Q34 + 1Q34 bis ?<br />

41. My statement on p. 332 in “The Impact of <strong>the</strong> Qumran Scrolls,” 327–39, has<br />

to be corrected, since it is not a covenant for <strong>the</strong> Qumran Community.<br />

42. This was overlooked by Timothy H. Lim, “Studying <strong>the</strong> Qumran Scrolls <strong>and</strong><br />

Paul in Their Historical Context,” in The Dead Sea Scrolls as Background to Postbiblical<br />

Judaism <strong>and</strong> Early Christianity (ed. J. R. Davila; STDJ 46; Leiden: Brill, 2003), 135–56,<br />

esp. 138–42.<br />

43. See Hartmut Stegemann, “Das Gesetzeskorpus der ‘Damaskusschrift’ (CD<br />

IX–XVI), RevQ 14, no. 55 (1990): 409–34, esp. 427–29; Hermann Lichtenberger <strong>and</strong><br />

Ekkehard Stegemann, “Zur Theologie des Bundes in Qumran und im Neuen<br />

Testament,” Kirche und Israel 6 (1991): 134–46, esp. 134–35.<br />

44. See Stegemann, “Gesetzeskorpus,” 427–28n79.<br />

45. For <strong>the</strong> problem of a “new covenant” in <strong>the</strong> Qumran texts <strong>and</strong> in Paul, see also<br />

Manuel Vogel, Das Heil des Bundes: Bundes<strong>the</strong>ologie im Frühjudentum und im frühen<br />

Christentum (TANZ 18; Tübingen: Francke, 1996); cf. also Hoegen-Rohls, “Neuheit<br />

bei Paulus.”

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!