11.10.2012 Views

the-bible-and-the-dead-sea-scrolls

the-bible-and-the-dead-sea-scrolls

the-bible-and-the-dead-sea-scrolls

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

SIDNIE WHITE CRAWFORD 145<br />

as an authoritative text, although <strong>the</strong> evidence from 4Q365 fragment 23<br />

may point in that direction.<br />

To return to <strong>the</strong> criteria for authority, <strong>the</strong> third criterion, “Is <strong>the</strong> book<br />

<strong>the</strong> subject of a commentary?” is not met by 4QRP. Thus, by failing<br />

beyond a reasonable doubt to meet <strong>the</strong> second <strong>and</strong> third criteria, 4QRP<br />

does not meet <strong>the</strong> second large requisite for scriptural status: community<br />

acceptance. This is not to say that 4QRP never, by anyone or at any time,<br />

was considered to have some type of scriptural status. The fact that it is<br />

found in five similar copies would indicate some degree of interest, <strong>and</strong><br />

its existence testifies to <strong>the</strong> importance of <strong>and</strong> fascination with <strong>the</strong> books<br />

of <strong>the</strong> Pentateuch in various forms in Second Temple Judaism, as exemplified<br />

by <strong>the</strong> Qumran community. What is lacking for 4QRP, however,<br />

is <strong>the</strong> desirable instance of absolutely certain citation; on this we base our<br />

caution concerning its authoritative status, similar to our caution concerning<br />

<strong>the</strong> Temple Scroll.<br />

THE GENESIS APOCRYPHON<br />

With <strong>the</strong> Genesis Apocryphon we move slightly outside <strong>the</strong> genre confines<br />

established above, for <strong>the</strong> Genesis Apocryphon, unlike <strong>the</strong> three works<br />

already discussed, was composed in Aramaic. 39 Thus, it is not only a<br />

rewriting of <strong>the</strong> biblical narrative, but also a translation. As such, it could<br />

not maintain <strong>the</strong> fiction that it was written by or dictated to Moses (as in<br />

4QRP <strong>and</strong> Jubilees), much less spoken by God (as in <strong>the</strong> Temple Scroll).<br />

Therefore, <strong>the</strong> question of authority is less important for <strong>the</strong> Genesis<br />

Apocryphon, since it does not, as far as can be determined from <strong>the</strong> extant<br />

columns, attempt to present itself as authoritative. However, <strong>the</strong> Genesis<br />

Apocryphon has several important connections to <strong>the</strong> book of Jubilees as<br />

well as o<strong>the</strong>r texts found at Qumran. 40 It testifies to <strong>the</strong> vast collection of<br />

exegetical material available on <strong>the</strong> text of <strong>the</strong> Pentateuch, some of which<br />

was incorporated into <strong>the</strong> Rewritten Bible texts.<br />

The Genesis Apocryphon is extant in twenty-one fragmentary columns,<br />

<strong>the</strong> best preserved of which are columns 2 <strong>and</strong> 19–22. The narrative in<br />

column 2 begins with <strong>the</strong> story of Lamech (Gen 5:28) <strong>and</strong> ends amid <strong>the</strong><br />

39. The Genesis Apocryphon was found in one copy in Cave 1. Its composition probably<br />

dates to <strong>the</strong> middle of <strong>the</strong> second century B.C.E. For <strong>the</strong> first publication, see<br />

Nahman Avigad <strong>and</strong> Yigael Yadin, A Genesis Apocryphon (Jerusalem: Magnes, 1956).<br />

See also Joseph A. Fitzmyer, The Genesis Apocryphon of Qumran Cave I (1Q20) (3d ed.;<br />

BibOr 18B; Rome: Biblical Institute, 2004).<br />

40. Most notably 1 Enoch.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!