11.10.2012 Views

the-bible-and-the-dead-sea-scrolls

the-bible-and-the-dead-sea-scrolls

the-bible-and-the-dead-sea-scrolls

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

GERBERN S. OEGEMA 395<br />

2c. Adventus Christi L.A.E. 51:9 (in appendix)<br />

3. a!nqrwpoj di/kaioj te/leioj Gen 6:9 (Noah)<br />

kai\ a#gioj Sir 44:17 (Noah)<br />

Mark 6:20 (John)<br />

The parallels mentioned here clearly indicate that <strong>the</strong>re was a well<br />

attested expectation of <strong>the</strong> “coming of (<strong>the</strong> Messiah as) <strong>the</strong> Righteous<br />

One” in <strong>the</strong> decades before <strong>and</strong> after Luke wrote his Acts of <strong>the</strong> Apostles.<br />

The expression appears in <strong>the</strong> earlier <strong>and</strong> contemporaneous Jewish writings,<br />

<strong>and</strong> also in <strong>the</strong> contemporaneous <strong>and</strong> later Christian writings,<br />

although <strong>the</strong> examples mentioned here also display a certain variety in<br />

<strong>the</strong> use of expressions associated to “Righteous One,” such as “Beloved<br />

One” <strong>and</strong> “Anointed One.”<br />

3.2. Date <strong>and</strong> Provenance of <strong>the</strong> “Coming of <strong>the</strong> Righteous One”<br />

in Stephen’s Speech<br />

Our findings, <strong>the</strong>refore, open <strong>the</strong> way for <strong>the</strong> option to consider <strong>the</strong> originally<br />

clearly nonchristological use of <strong>the</strong> expression of <strong>the</strong> “Coming of<br />

<strong>the</strong> Righteous One” tradition-historically seen as closest to <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>ological<br />

reflections on <strong>the</strong> meaning of Jesus for his earliest followers as found<br />

in Q. Thus, this figure is <strong>the</strong> last one of a series of prophets who had been<br />

murdered, as I have argued elsewhere. 53<br />

This would make it necessary to argue for an early date of <strong>the</strong> tradition<br />

referred to by Stephen <strong>and</strong> reported by Luke in Acts 7:52, somewhere<br />

between <strong>the</strong> thirties <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> sixties of <strong>the</strong> first century C.E. There<br />

is nothing that speaks against such an early date, although we have little<br />

proof for it. The frequent use of <strong>the</strong> expression h9 e0leu/sij tou/ dikai/ou in<br />

<strong>the</strong> Jewish Pseudepigrapha preserved in Greek <strong>and</strong> in Acts 7:52, however,<br />

is a strong argument for such an early date.<br />

Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, <strong>the</strong> lack of a clear christological interpretation of <strong>the</strong><br />

“Coming of <strong>the</strong> Righteous One,” o<strong>the</strong>r than that of <strong>the</strong> last of <strong>the</strong> persecuted<br />

prophets, argues for an early date in <strong>the</strong> history of <strong>the</strong> development<br />

of early-Christian Christology. Also, since <strong>the</strong> whole of Stephen’s speech<br />

in Acts may have a pre-Lukan origin, <strong>the</strong>re is more that speaks in favor<br />

of an early ra<strong>the</strong>r than a late date for Acts 7:52. However, this <strong>the</strong>ory<br />

requires some fur<strong>the</strong>r investigation.<br />

53. Gerbern S. Oegema, Das Heil ist aus den Juden: Studien zum historischen Jesus und<br />

seiner Rezeption im Urchristentum (Theos 50; Hamburg: Kovač, 2001), 25–38.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!