11.10.2012 Views

the-bible-and-the-dead-sea-scrolls

the-bible-and-the-dead-sea-scrolls

the-bible-and-the-dead-sea-scrolls

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

MAGEN BROSHI 243<br />

younger.” As it st<strong>and</strong>s written: “Jacob I loved, but Esau I hated.” (Rom<br />

9:10–13) 31<br />

Paul was fully aware of <strong>the</strong> basic moral difficulty that predestination<br />

poses, i.e., damnation without having sinned:<br />

What <strong>the</strong>n shall we say? Is God unjust? Certainly not! (Rom 9:14).<br />

The adequacy of Paul’s solution is beyond <strong>the</strong> scope of this paper, but<br />

<strong>the</strong> fact that he felt <strong>the</strong> injustice inherent in predestination is noteworthy.<br />

We could go on <strong>and</strong> quote a number of o<strong>the</strong>r predestinarian Pauline<br />

passages (e.g., Phil 2:13b–14), 32 but we will conclude with only one more:<br />

“Therefore He has mercy on whomever He wills <strong>and</strong> hardens <strong>the</strong> heart of<br />

whomever He chooses” (Rom 9:18).<br />

This was chosen by Otto as <strong>the</strong> pure <strong>and</strong> proper predestinarian expression. 33<br />

S<strong>and</strong>ers is certainly right in saying that “precisely how we should formulate<br />

<strong>the</strong> balance between predestination <strong>and</strong> decision is difficult to<br />

say.” 34 Side by side we have a verse just quoted (9:18) <strong>and</strong> a chapter later<br />

(10:13–17) we are confronted with <strong>the</strong> sequence preaching—hearing—faith<br />

which absolutely disregards predestination. Caird has shown clearly how<br />

Paul’s epistle irenically harbors contradictory, conflicting views. 35<br />

On <strong>the</strong> influence of <strong>the</strong> Essenes on Paul <strong>the</strong>re is almost a unanimous<br />

agreement. 36 Even without <strong>the</strong> amazing passage in 2 Cor 6:14–7:1, which<br />

reads like a classic Qumranic text, slightly adapted <strong>and</strong> Christianized, 37<br />

<strong>the</strong>re are numerous points of contact between <strong>the</strong> Pauline corpus <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Scrolls. The channels through which <strong>the</strong> Essene influence reached Paul<br />

are not known to us, but <strong>the</strong>re is absolutely no doubt about <strong>the</strong> existence,<br />

<strong>the</strong> intensity <strong>and</strong> significance of such an influence. In 1963 H. Braun<br />

31. Fitzmyer, ibid., 524.<br />

32. Günter Röhser, Prädestination und Verstockung: Untersuchungen zur frühjüdischen, paulinischen<br />

und johannischen Theologie (Texte und Arbeiten zum neutestamentlichen Zeitalter<br />

14; Tübingen: Francke, 1994), 93–94.<br />

33. Rudolf Otto, The Idea of <strong>the</strong> Holy (1950) 86–88.<br />

34. Ed P. S<strong>and</strong>ers, Paul <strong>and</strong> Palestinian Judaism (London: SCM Press, 1977), 447.<br />

35. George B. Caird, “Predestination: Romans IX–XI,” ET 68 (1956–1957): 324–27.<br />

36. “Almost.” Heikki Räisänen, “Paul, God, <strong>and</strong> Israel: Romans 9–11 in Recent<br />

Re<strong>sea</strong>rch,” in The Social World of Formative Christianity <strong>and</strong> Judaism: Essays in Tribute to<br />

Howard Clark Kee (ed. J. Neusner et al.; Philadelphia: Fortress, 1988), 183–84, gives<br />

<strong>the</strong> impression that <strong>the</strong> notion of double predestination in Romans was somehow a<br />

Pauline invention. See also Elizabeth Johnson, in Pauline Theology. Vol. III: Romans (ed.<br />

D. M. Hay <strong>and</strong> E. E. Johnson; Minneapolis: Fortress, 1995), 22–24; reissued under<br />

<strong>the</strong> same title by SBL (SBLSymS; Atlanta: Scholars Press, 2002), 21–23.<br />

37. Joseph A. Fitzmyer, Essays in <strong>the</strong> Semitic Background of <strong>the</strong> New Testament (London:<br />

Geoffrey Chapman, 1971), 205–17.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!