01.07.2013 Views

The Supreme Doctrine - neo-alchemist

The Supreme Doctrine - neo-alchemist

The Supreme Doctrine - neo-alchemist

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

PREFACE<br />

we understand intuitively that they explain in us phenomena otherwise<br />

inexplicable.<br />

All that I have just written deals with the fundamental<br />

misunderstanding that we have to avoid. <strong>The</strong>re are a certain number of<br />

misunderstandings of less importance which we should now consider.<br />

Very little will be gained from this book regarding it as a 'digest' that<br />

seeks to explain to you 'what you should know concerning Zen'. To begin<br />

with it is impossible to conceive of a 'vulgarised' treatment of such subjects;<br />

no book will give a rapid initiation in Zen. And then, as a matter of fact, my<br />

book is written for those who have already thought much on Oriental and far-<br />

Eastern metaphysics, who have read the essential among what is available on<br />

the subject, and who seek to obtain an understanding adapted to their<br />

occidental outlook. My supposed reader should have read particularly <strong>The</strong><br />

Zen <strong>Doctrine</strong> of No-Mind of Dr. D. T. Suzuki, or, at least, the preceding<br />

works of the same author. I do not pretend that my endeavours conform to a<br />

Zen 'orthodoxy'. <strong>The</strong> ideas that I put forth therein have come to me in<br />

espousing the Zen point of view as I have understood it through the medium<br />

of the books that set it forth; that is all. Moreover it is impossible here to<br />

speak of 'orthodoxy' because there is nothing systematised in Zen; Zen<br />

compares all teaching with a finger that points at the moon, and it puts us<br />

unceasingly on guard against the mistake of placing the accent of Reality on<br />

this finger which is only a means and which, in itself, has no importance.<br />

Nor do I call myself an 'adept of Zen'; Zen is not a church in which, or<br />

outside which, one can be; it is a universal point of view, offered to all,<br />

imposed on none; it is not a party to which one can belong, to which one<br />

owes allegiance. I can help myself from the Zen point of view, in my search<br />

for the truth, without dressing myself up in a Chinese or a Japanese robe,<br />

either in fact or in metaphor. In the domain of pure thought labels disappear<br />

and there is no dilemma as between East and West. I am an Occidental in the<br />

sense that I have an occidental manner of thinking, but this does not hinder<br />

me from meeting the Orientals on the intellectual plane and participating in<br />

their understanding of the state of man in general. I do not need to burn the<br />

Gospels in order to read Hui-neng.<br />

It is because I have an occidental manner of thinking that I have written<br />

this book in the way that I have written it. Zen, as Dr. Suzuki says, 'detests<br />

every kind of intellectuality'; the Zen Masters do not make dissertations in<br />

reply to the questions that they are asked; more often they reply with a phrase<br />

11

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!