01.07.2013 Views

The Supreme Doctrine - neo-alchemist

The Supreme Doctrine - neo-alchemist

The Supreme Doctrine - neo-alchemist

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

THE FIVE MODES OF THOUGHT<br />

speaking, let him beware; there are a thousand ways of believing that one has<br />

it, whereas one has it not; in any case the mistake is the same and consists in<br />

one complication or another which comprises forms; one is not simpleminded<br />

enough. In-formal and immediate perception of existence is the simplest kind<br />

of perception there can be. Correctly carried out it can be obtained in the<br />

middle of the most intense external activity and without disturbing that; I do<br />

not have to turn away from what I am doing, but rather to feel myself existing<br />

in the very centre of the formal world of my activity and of the attention that<br />

I pay to it.<br />

<strong>The</strong> natural man, as we have said above, is loath to envisage a<br />

diminution of his emotions. He resembles a caterpillar that can become a<br />

butterfly if it passes through the stage of a chrysalis. <strong>The</strong> caterpillar only<br />

moves along the ground. It cannot fly, or profit by the height dimension; but<br />

at least it moves; compared with this movement the immobility of the<br />

chrysalis might seem to it to be horrible. Nevertheless the temporary<br />

renouncement of an imperfect movement procures him ultimately a superior<br />

movement. Emotions are like the movement of the caterpillar; it is not flying<br />

but it resembles it and, with imagination, one succeeds in mistaking it for<br />

that. Man holds onto the bright sparks of his inner short-circuitings, and he<br />

has to reflect long and honestly in order to understand that these simple<br />

fireworks could never lead to anything. <strong>The</strong>re is no real renunciation as long<br />

as one continues to attach value to that which one renounces.<br />

We will take up again now, in another way, the whole problem studied<br />

in this essay.<br />

That which popular language calls 'physical' and 'moral' corresponds<br />

with two domains which co-exist in us and which appear to us to be clearly<br />

different. <strong>The</strong> impressions by means of which I feel myself to be living, I<br />

range in my somatic or in my psychic life; for instance when I feel my life<br />

negatively, when I feel it is menaced, attacked, that may be through physical<br />

pain or through moral suffering. It is as though my 'being' presented two<br />

faces to make contact with the outside world, one somatic, the other psychic,<br />

and penetrated by the constructive or destructive influences of the outside<br />

world.<br />

My impressions are released by the outside world, but I feel them wellup<br />

in myself; my physical pain may be due to a blow, but I feel that it springs<br />

from my body; my moral suffering may be due to any external event, but I<br />

feel that it takes its rise in what I call my 'soul'. If I try to see from where, in<br />

65

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!