The Supreme Doctrine - neo-alchemist
The Supreme Doctrine - neo-alchemist
The Supreme Doctrine - neo-alchemist
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
THE FIVE MODES OF THOUGHT<br />
speaking, let him beware; there are a thousand ways of believing that one has<br />
it, whereas one has it not; in any case the mistake is the same and consists in<br />
one complication or another which comprises forms; one is not simpleminded<br />
enough. In-formal and immediate perception of existence is the simplest kind<br />
of perception there can be. Correctly carried out it can be obtained in the<br />
middle of the most intense external activity and without disturbing that; I do<br />
not have to turn away from what I am doing, but rather to feel myself existing<br />
in the very centre of the formal world of my activity and of the attention that<br />
I pay to it.<br />
<strong>The</strong> natural man, as we have said above, is loath to envisage a<br />
diminution of his emotions. He resembles a caterpillar that can become a<br />
butterfly if it passes through the stage of a chrysalis. <strong>The</strong> caterpillar only<br />
moves along the ground. It cannot fly, or profit by the height dimension; but<br />
at least it moves; compared with this movement the immobility of the<br />
chrysalis might seem to it to be horrible. Nevertheless the temporary<br />
renouncement of an imperfect movement procures him ultimately a superior<br />
movement. Emotions are like the movement of the caterpillar; it is not flying<br />
but it resembles it and, with imagination, one succeeds in mistaking it for<br />
that. Man holds onto the bright sparks of his inner short-circuitings, and he<br />
has to reflect long and honestly in order to understand that these simple<br />
fireworks could never lead to anything. <strong>The</strong>re is no real renunciation as long<br />
as one continues to attach value to that which one renounces.<br />
We will take up again now, in another way, the whole problem studied<br />
in this essay.<br />
That which popular language calls 'physical' and 'moral' corresponds<br />
with two domains which co-exist in us and which appear to us to be clearly<br />
different. <strong>The</strong> impressions by means of which I feel myself to be living, I<br />
range in my somatic or in my psychic life; for instance when I feel my life<br />
negatively, when I feel it is menaced, attacked, that may be through physical<br />
pain or through moral suffering. It is as though my 'being' presented two<br />
faces to make contact with the outside world, one somatic, the other psychic,<br />
and penetrated by the constructive or destructive influences of the outside<br />
world.<br />
My impressions are released by the outside world, but I feel them wellup<br />
in myself; my physical pain may be due to a blow, but I feel that it springs<br />
from my body; my moral suffering may be due to any external event, but I<br />
feel that it takes its rise in what I call my 'soul'. If I try to see from where, in<br />
65