The Supreme Doctrine - neo-alchemist

EMOTION AND THE EMOTIVE STATE
Some euphoric people appear to be constantly possessed by a positive
emotive state, and this fact seems to contradict what we have just explained.
The study of the apparent happiness of the natural man is very interesting
because it can help us better to understand what the emotive state is. If I
observe myself continuously I perceive that I am occasionally euphoric and
that this state corresponds with a moment at which my doubt of myself is
transitorily asleep. An external situation that is moderately affirming and
which appears sufficiently stable, added to a good physical condition, puts
my inner 'trial' to sleep; for lack of incidents in court judge and witnesses
have gone to sleep. My subconscious psychological plane is drowsy. At the
same time I am in an agreeable 'state'. But this agreeable state does not
correspond with a positivity of the emotive state in activity, it corresponds
with a non-activity of the emotive state; it does not correspond with a
decision, favourable at last, of the trial, but with a temporary suspension of
this trial; it does not correspond with a destruction of my illusory belief that I
lack something, but with a temporary quiescence of this illusion. How is this
possible? Since the Ego continues to exist how can its trial thus be
suspended?
An examination of the man who is habitually euphoric will give us the
answer. Where this man is concerned the need of the Absolute is weak, often
practically non-existent. When his desire for egotistical affirmation is assured
of a certain degree of satisfaction this desire is calmed and asks no more; this
man can rest satisfied with what he has. Soothing mechanisms have
developed in him: he knows how to present to himself the situations which
face him in the outer world in such a way as to look at their affirming aspects
and to avoid seeing their negating aspects. For the profound inner trial there
is substituted on the surface a monotonous apology for oneself; the trial is
almost always asleep. It is interesting to observe that this man is particularly
unsusceptible; one can criticise him fairly severely without wounding his
self-respect, and this anaesthesia of self-respect corresponds with the puttingto-sleep
of the trial. This man appears more or less devoid of an Ego. The
Ego exists nevertheless but, on account of the weakness of the need for the
Absolute, the compensations that have been established keep all their efficacy
in the use that is made of them. Doubt of oneself is put on one side beneath a
shelter that time does not weaken; such a man does not tire of the attitudes
(compensations) which he assumes before the external world. But the
apparent positivity of his emotive states only corresponds with the
126