The Supreme Doctrine - neo-alchemist
The Supreme Doctrine - neo-alchemist
The Supreme Doctrine - neo-alchemist
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
THE INNER ALCHEMY<br />
exterior operation of my machine is modified when I cease to believe in a<br />
personal God, an object of love and of dread, and when I arrive at conceiving<br />
abstractly my Buddha-nature as being above all thought and all sentiment.<br />
This process of distillation, due to the work of intellectual intuition,<br />
corresponds to the idea, often expressed in this work, that our correct inner<br />
evolution destroys nothing but fulfills everything. <strong>The</strong> apparent death of the<br />
'old' man is not in reality a destruction. When I extract alcohol from fruit I do<br />
not destroy the essence of the fruit, but rather purify it, concentrate it, and<br />
fulfill it. In the same way I fulfill my conception of Reality when I evolve<br />
from the image of the Child-Jesus to the image of the Void. <strong>The</strong>re is apparent<br />
death because there is a diminution of the visible, of that which is perceptible<br />
by the senses and the mind; but nothing has been destroyed just because the<br />
belief in the Reality of a perception ceases to exist. <strong>The</strong> fulfillment of the<br />
human-being carries with it the disappearance of the illusory Reality of<br />
images perceived by the senses and the mind.<br />
<strong>The</strong> condition of man, at his birth, is to feel himself fundamentally<br />
unsatisfied; he believes that he lacks something. What he is and what he has<br />
does not suit him; he expects something else, a 'true life'; he seeks a solution<br />
of his pretended problem, claiming such and such situations in existence.<br />
This revendicative attitude, which engenders all our sufferings, is not to be<br />
destroyed, but to be fulfilled. We have seen, in studying the compensations,<br />
how our claim and attachment are subtilised. All our personal attachments<br />
derive from our central attachment to the image of our Ego, to the image of<br />
ourselves-as-distinct, by means of identifying association between a personal<br />
image and this general image. <strong>The</strong> more my understanding deepens, the more<br />
these associations are abolished; my attachment is thus purified, subtilised,<br />
and concentrated; it becomes less and less apparent, more and more nonmanifested.<br />
<strong>The</strong> attached revendication is not reduced by an atom before<br />
satori, but it purifies itself, and fulfills itself according as the instant<br />
approaches of the sudden transformation when attachment and detachment<br />
are conciliated.<br />
My amour-propre is an aspect of my revendicatory attention. It also is<br />
purified in the extent to which I understand. To the people who observe me<br />
from outside, I appear to be more modest. But I feel clearly that it is not so.<br />
My amour-propre becomes more and more subtle and concentrated, so that<br />
one sees it less; it fulfills itself, tending in one sense towards the zero of<br />
222