The Supreme Doctrine - neo-alchemist
The Supreme Doctrine - neo-alchemist
The Supreme Doctrine - neo-alchemist
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Chapter Seventeen<br />
THE HORSEMAN AND THE HORSE<br />
THE dualism of the Yin and the Yang, which rules the cosmos under the<br />
conciliation of the Tao, exists in man as in all created things. Man is<br />
conscious of this dualism, which reveals itself in him by the belief that<br />
he is composed of two autonomous parts which he either calls 'body' and<br />
'soul', 'matter and spirit', 'instinct and reason', or otherwise. <strong>The</strong> belief in this<br />
bipartite composition expresses itself in all sorts of common sayings: 'I am<br />
master of "myself"', 'I cannot prevent myself from...', 'I am pleased with<br />
myself', 'I am annoyed with myself', etc....<br />
But we know that the belief in the autonomy of these two parts is an<br />
illusion; there are not in man two distinct parts, but only two distinct aspects<br />
of a single being; man is in reality an individual artificially divided by an<br />
erro<strong>neo</strong>us interpretation of his analytic observation. <strong>The</strong> error of our dualistic<br />
conception does not lie in the discrimination between two aspects in us—for<br />
there are indeed two aspects—but in concluding that these two aspects are<br />
two different entities, of whom one, for example, may be perishable while the<br />
other is eternal. To tell the truth, our observation does not show us that there<br />
are two parts in us; it only shows us that everything happens in us as though<br />
there were two parts separated by a hiatus. It is our ignorant intellect that<br />
takes an illusory leap from the statement 'everything happens as though' to<br />
the erro<strong>neo</strong>us affirmation that there are in us two parts separated by a hiatus.<br />
In reality it all happens in us thus because we believe that it is thus or, more<br />
precisely, because the universal consciousness which alone can reveal to us<br />
our real inner unity is asleep in us. An illustration will help us to understand<br />
this problem. What man interprets as his two parts he conceives, the one as<br />
inferior, instinctive, affective, motor, irrational, the other as superior, rational,<br />
directing, capable of deciding what the inferior part should carry out. He<br />
conceives himself as a horseman riding a horse.<br />
In reality, as Zen reminds us, we are not horseman and horse, with a<br />
hiatus between the two. <strong>The</strong> true symbolic representation of man, in this<br />
connexion, should be the centaur, a single creature comprising two aspects<br />
155