The Supreme Doctrine - neo-alchemist

‘GOOD’ AND ‘EVIL’
reciprocally; looked at in this manner neither is of a nature superior to the
other. But the play of the active force causes the play of the passive force; if
the play of my arm is action the play of the inertia of the stone is reaction.
And what is true of these two forces in this minor phenomenon is equally true
at all stages of universal creation. The two inferior principles, positive and
negative, conceived in the abstract or existing apart from their interplay, are
not the cause of one another; they derive, independently of one another, from
a Primary Cause in the eyes of which they are strictly equal. But as soon as
we envisage them in action we observe that the play of the active force
causes the play of the passive force (it is in this that 'God' desires the
existence of the 'Devil' and not the other way round). In so far as the two
inferior principles interact and create, the positive principle sets in motion the
play of the negative principle, and it then possesses in that respect an
indisputable superiority over this negative principle. The primacy of the
active force over the passive force does not consist in a chronological
precedence (it is at the same moment that reaction and action occur) but in a
causal precedence; one could express that by saying that the instantaneous
current by means of which the Superior Principle activates the two inferior
principles reaches the negative principle in passing by the positive. In this
way we can understand that the two inferior principles, equal noumenally, are
unequal phenomenally, the positive being superior to the negative. If the
force that moves the sister of charity is strictly equal to that which moves the
assassin, the helping of orphans represents an undeniable superiority over
assassination; but let us note at the same time that it is the concrete charitable
action which possesses an incontestable superiority over the concrete murder,
while the two acts, regarded in the abstract, are equal since, so regarded, they
are no longer anything but the symbolic representatives of equal positive and
negative forces.
Arrived at this point we can understand that every constructive
phenomenon manifests the play of the active force (action) and that every
destructive phenomenon manifests the play of the passive force (reaction). It
is for this reason that the man who has attained 'realisation' is as constructive,
at every moment, as circumstances allow him; this man in fact is freed from
conditioned reflexes: he no longer reacts, he is active; being active he is
constructive.
Such and such a destructive demeanour on the part of the 'wicked' man
can seem to show initiative, can appear to result from the play of an active
25