The Supreme Doctrine - neo-alchemist
The Supreme Doctrine - neo-alchemist
The Supreme Doctrine - neo-alchemist
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
ON AFFECTIVITY<br />
of the global image that I have of myself). <strong>The</strong> painful excitation can reach<br />
me either in passing by my gross aspect (plane of sensation), or in passing by<br />
my subtle aspect (plane of images or of sentiment). So, on the side of the pole<br />
'painful excitation', our materialistic thesis is applicable; it is always my soma<br />
which is painfully excited in part or in whole. If we go on now to the pole<br />
'consciousness of pain' our 'spiritual' thesis is applicable: it is always my<br />
mind which is conscious of the pain, whether the painful excitation has<br />
affected my soma in part or in whole.<br />
Let us now envisage these two poles 'painful excitation' and<br />
'consciousness of pain' by asking ourselves in which of these the pain resides.<br />
<strong>The</strong> difficulties begin again: in fact I cannot make the pain reside in the<br />
painful excitation alone without consciousness of the pain; but neither can I<br />
conceive a pain which is pure consciousness, without painful excitation.<br />
Where then does the pain really reside? This question in its 'spatial'<br />
expression, is the form in which is translated, according to our space-time<br />
perspective, the question 'What is the reality of pain?' or, still better, 'What is<br />
the cause of the pain?' since the cause is the reality of the effect. <strong>The</strong> painful<br />
excitation is causal in relation to my consciousness of the pain; my mind is<br />
affected because my soma is affected. But the affection of my soma is itself<br />
the effect of a cause. This cause is not the outer world as one might suppose<br />
at first sight. Indeed the affection of my soma is reaction to the action of the<br />
outer world; if the action of the outer world can be called the immediate<br />
cause it cannot be called the efficient cause. <strong>The</strong> efficient or real cause of the<br />
reaction of my soma is in my soma itself, not outside it; it is in my vital<br />
principle, in the source of all my manifestation, that is to say in the Absolute<br />
Principle in so far as it manifests in me. We find then, in the genesis of<br />
conscious pain, three stages: the Absolute Principle first; next my somatic<br />
aspect which, activated by the Absolute Principle, develops what we have<br />
called 'painful excitation'; finally my subtle aspect which, prompted by the<br />
painful excitation, develops the consciousness of pain. <strong>The</strong> Absolute<br />
Principle corresponds to the fundamental Unconscious; the painful excitation<br />
corresponds to the 'subconscious' (my suffering, during my distraction, was<br />
subconscious); the consciousness of pain corresponds to the conscious.<br />
We see then that pain, in its ensemble, is an uninterrupted flux of<br />
energy which disintegrates from the universal centre towards the individual<br />
periphery. Reality, or the primary cause, of all this phenomenal current<br />
resides in the fundamental Unconscious. In other words the reality of<br />
151