The Supreme Doctrine - neo-alchemist
The Supreme Doctrine - neo-alchemist
The Supreme Doctrine - neo-alchemist
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
SENSATION AND SENTIMENT<br />
the outer world; but my false emotive reaction can be radically different for it<br />
depends on my ideal vision of myself. It is made up of sentiments that I<br />
cherish, no longer with regard to the outer world but concerning my attitudes<br />
before this outer world. On account of that I can very well be falsely gay (in<br />
my imaginary emotivity) while being at the same time authentically sad in<br />
my authentic emotivity, or the other way round.<br />
For example: I have amused myself, months beforehand, with the<br />
thought of my annual holidays; an image of myself-joyous-at-seeing-<br />
Florence has firmly developed in my mind; if I am 'idealistic', strongly<br />
'egotistical', greedy to 'be absolutely', the realisation of this image becomes<br />
for me the object of a very imperious need. Once I am in Florence, I find<br />
myself very tired and depressed; my authentic state, which mocks at my<br />
vision of myself and only responds to the real circumstance, is contracted; at<br />
bottom I am unhappy. But my desire to see realised the image of myselfjoyous-in-Florence<br />
forbids me to realise that I am unhappy; if anyone asks<br />
me: 'Well, and this holiday?', I reply: 'Splendid; all these museums are a bit<br />
tiring, but what does that matter compared with so much beauty.' If I then<br />
direct my attention to my emotivity with an honest spirit of investigation, I<br />
see the naked truth: I am unhappy, more unhappy than I usually am in the<br />
Underground which takes me to my work; and I see that, without a special<br />
effort, I cannot realise it; or else I realised my sadness but I attached it<br />
illusorily to an imaginary film which was only the effect of it.<br />
Another example: here is a boy who has been tyranised over for years<br />
by an egoistic father; he has been humiliated, interfered with in all his<br />
undertakings, negated by a sadistic education which was by way of being<br />
devoted to his welfare. <strong>The</strong> father dies. <strong>The</strong> authentic emotive response of the<br />
son is immense relief. But, if this son is very 'idealistic' he has such a need to<br />
see himself as sad that he arrives at the state despite the facts; and the sadness<br />
of his imaginary film can prevent to a great extent, or even altogether, the<br />
profound relief.<br />
This disaccord between my emotions and my imaginary emotive states<br />
is particularly striking from the following point of view: my ideal image,<br />
absolute, divine, comprises amongst other 'divine' attributes, stability,<br />
immutability; but the Absolute Principle, the fundamental One, from which<br />
everything emanates, is immutable, above time and the alterations of time.<br />
And so one of the essential attributes of the image that I wish to have of<br />
myself consists in evenness of humour, stability of the emotive state. That is<br />
141