01.07.2013 Views

The Supreme Doctrine - neo-alchemist

The Supreme Doctrine - neo-alchemist

The Supreme Doctrine - neo-alchemist

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter Four<br />

THE EXISTENTIALISM OF ZEN<br />

A<br />

MAN declares: 'My life is insipid and monotonous; I do not call that<br />

living; at most it is existing.' Everyone understands what this man<br />

means to say, which proves that everyone carries in himself the idea<br />

of this distinction. At the same time, everyone feels that 'living' is superior to<br />

'existing'; and this opinion is so clear, so categoric, in the mind of man, that<br />

he comes to regard to 'exist' as nothing, and to 'live' as everything. <strong>The</strong><br />

distinction between the two terms is such that often it demolishes itself; one<br />

ends by saying 'existence' for 'life' and vice versa. 'Life' appears so uniquely<br />

important to man that it annexes the word 'existence' stripped of all its own<br />

meaning.<br />

Among the complex mass of phenomena which make up a humanbeing,<br />

which are those that proceed from living and which from existing? We<br />

find there the distinction between the animal kingdom and the vegetable<br />

kingdom. Animal and vegetable are not two creatures entirely different; the<br />

animal has everything that the vegetable has (vegetative life) and something<br />

more (life of communication). Inside the vegetable and the animal, within the<br />

limit constituted by their form, phenomena occur, intimate movements<br />

(circulation of sap or of blood, breathing, birth and death of cells, anabolism<br />

and catabolism). But, whereas the vegetable is fixed to the soil and has no<br />

movement of its whole self in relation to the soil, the animal is mobile in<br />

relation to the soil and can make all sorts of movements that one describes by<br />

the word 'action'.<br />

However, when man places living so much above existing the frontier<br />

of this preferential distinction does not lie between their vegetative<br />

phenomena and their actions; it lies within the domain of action, and in the<br />

following manner: among my actions some have for object the service of my<br />

vegetative life (to eat, to repose, to perform the sexual act by pure animal<br />

desire); these actions affirm me (that is to say maintain my creation) in so far<br />

as I am an organism in all respects similar to all the other animals, in so far as<br />

I live from the point of view of the universe, as a cosmic cog-wheel, in so far<br />

31

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!