01.07.2013 Views

The Supreme Doctrine - neo-alchemist

The Supreme Doctrine - neo-alchemist

The Supreme Doctrine - neo-alchemist

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

LIBERTY AS ‘TOTAL DETERMINISM’<br />

<strong>The</strong> laws of partial determinism operate only on the concrete plane,<br />

temporal and spatial. Each particular manifestation of these laws operating in<br />

the partial is apparently disordered. This man, for example, has an unhappy<br />

destiny during the whole of his existence, while that other man has a happy<br />

destiny. <strong>The</strong> partial determinism, operating in appearance; appears to be<br />

unbalanced, unjust, disordered.<br />

<strong>The</strong> law of total determinism operates not only on the plane of<br />

particular phenomena, but in the universal. We can only conceive this<br />

determinism as perfectly ordered. <strong>The</strong> totality of positive phenomena is<br />

exactly balanced by the totality of negative phenomena. Each phenomenon is<br />

integrated in a totality in which it is counter-balanced by a phenomenon that<br />

is exactly complementary.<br />

<strong>The</strong> partial determinism, phenomenal, apparent, visible, disordered, is<br />

not 'real' since it is partial (and there can only be Reality which includes<br />

totality). But the ignorant man takes the visible for the real; also he believes<br />

in the unique reality of this partial determinism; and this is revealed by the<br />

fact that he calls it 'determinism'. Besides, this man has a certain innate<br />

intuition of Reality, that is to say of the <strong>Supreme</strong> Principle, which he<br />

conceives as endowed, among other attributes, with liberty. Since, for him,<br />

determinism only exists at the partial level, and since he does not conceive<br />

total determinism as operating at the level of the <strong>Supreme</strong> Principle, he<br />

opposes the only determinism that he knows to the liberty of the <strong>Supreme</strong><br />

Principle. Thus he finishes up with the opposition between 'determinism and<br />

liberty'. In reality this opposition is illusory. What is not illusory is the<br />

distinction between 'partial determinism and total determinism', a distinction<br />

which is not at all an opposition, but which expresses two different views,<br />

one at the individual level, the other at the universal level, of one and the<br />

same Causal Reality.<br />

<strong>The</strong> natural egotistical man desires to be free, unconditioned, while<br />

thinking of himself as a distinct individual. I can envisage myself thus as a<br />

distinct individual, as a psycho-somatic organism, but I ought then to<br />

understand my liberation from partial determinism as a passing-beyond, an<br />

accomplishment of this partial determinism in the total determinism of the<br />

<strong>Supreme</strong> Principle. When I have attained Realisation my psycho-somatic<br />

organism will no longer be governed only by the apparently disordered laws<br />

of partial determinism but by the total law of universal and cosmic<br />

equilibrium, a law rigorously ordered which is the principle of all the<br />

72

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!