The Supreme Doctrine - neo-alchemist
The Supreme Doctrine - neo-alchemist
The Supreme Doctrine - neo-alchemist
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
LIBERTY AS ‘TOTAL DETERMINISM’<br />
<strong>The</strong> laws of partial determinism operate only on the concrete plane,<br />
temporal and spatial. Each particular manifestation of these laws operating in<br />
the partial is apparently disordered. This man, for example, has an unhappy<br />
destiny during the whole of his existence, while that other man has a happy<br />
destiny. <strong>The</strong> partial determinism, operating in appearance; appears to be<br />
unbalanced, unjust, disordered.<br />
<strong>The</strong> law of total determinism operates not only on the plane of<br />
particular phenomena, but in the universal. We can only conceive this<br />
determinism as perfectly ordered. <strong>The</strong> totality of positive phenomena is<br />
exactly balanced by the totality of negative phenomena. Each phenomenon is<br />
integrated in a totality in which it is counter-balanced by a phenomenon that<br />
is exactly complementary.<br />
<strong>The</strong> partial determinism, phenomenal, apparent, visible, disordered, is<br />
not 'real' since it is partial (and there can only be Reality which includes<br />
totality). But the ignorant man takes the visible for the real; also he believes<br />
in the unique reality of this partial determinism; and this is revealed by the<br />
fact that he calls it 'determinism'. Besides, this man has a certain innate<br />
intuition of Reality, that is to say of the <strong>Supreme</strong> Principle, which he<br />
conceives as endowed, among other attributes, with liberty. Since, for him,<br />
determinism only exists at the partial level, and since he does not conceive<br />
total determinism as operating at the level of the <strong>Supreme</strong> Principle, he<br />
opposes the only determinism that he knows to the liberty of the <strong>Supreme</strong><br />
Principle. Thus he finishes up with the opposition between 'determinism and<br />
liberty'. In reality this opposition is illusory. What is not illusory is the<br />
distinction between 'partial determinism and total determinism', a distinction<br />
which is not at all an opposition, but which expresses two different views,<br />
one at the individual level, the other at the universal level, of one and the<br />
same Causal Reality.<br />
<strong>The</strong> natural egotistical man desires to be free, unconditioned, while<br />
thinking of himself as a distinct individual. I can envisage myself thus as a<br />
distinct individual, as a psycho-somatic organism, but I ought then to<br />
understand my liberation from partial determinism as a passing-beyond, an<br />
accomplishment of this partial determinism in the total determinism of the<br />
<strong>Supreme</strong> Principle. When I have attained Realisation my psycho-somatic<br />
organism will no longer be governed only by the apparently disordered laws<br />
of partial determinism but by the total law of universal and cosmic<br />
equilibrium, a law rigorously ordered which is the principle of all the<br />
72