The Supreme Doctrine - neo-alchemist
The Supreme Doctrine - neo-alchemist
The Supreme Doctrine - neo-alchemist
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
SENSATION AND SENTIMENT<br />
no motionless emotivity; there are only contractions, no spasm; there is no<br />
emotive state, but only emotions.<br />
When it is a question of an imaginary film everything is much more<br />
complicated. <strong>The</strong> relation with emotivity is no longer one-way, it exists in<br />
both directions at once. It exists first of all as it existed in the preceding case;<br />
the emotivity reacts to the imaginary images as it reacted to the real images<br />
(emotivity does not differentiate between these two kinds of images; a jealous<br />
man who vigorously imagines a scene in which his wife deceives him is as if<br />
the scene were real). But on the other hand the emotive state reacts to the<br />
elaboration of the imaginary film; if a real misfortune befalls me and saddens<br />
me I start imagining a thousand other misfortunes and I see everything in the<br />
same sombre light. Thus there is established a vicious circle of double<br />
reactions.<br />
But, in this relation between emotivity and imaginary film, another<br />
more important factor intervenes. <strong>The</strong> imaginary film resembles the real film<br />
to a certain extent; the films that I invent are necessarily elaborated with the<br />
elements that I have received in the past from the outside world; but there<br />
exists an essential difference between these two kinds of films. <strong>The</strong> real film<br />
is invented by the Cosmos, its source is the cosmic source, which is the<br />
Primary Cause of the Universe; therefore every real film is harmonic,<br />
balanced in the Whole. Its fixed centre is the Noumenon, and there could not<br />
be in this film any phenomenal fixity, it is only pure movement. On the<br />
contrary the imaginary film is centred on my Ego, on 'myself pretending to be<br />
absolutely a distinct individual'; its source, its centre, is not the immutable<br />
noumenal centre of the Cosmos, but a false, ex-centric centre. And there is, in<br />
this film, at the same time as a continual movement, a certain phenomenal<br />
fixity derived from this phenomenal centre. This is revealed by the fact that<br />
my day-dreams, if they are made of moving images, are made of images<br />
which turn ever more and more round a fixed idea; they are always more or<br />
less obsessional. My imaginary scenarios are organised in constellations or<br />
complexes, artificially coherent outside the cosmic Whole. To this<br />
phenomenal fixity corresponds a fixity in the emotive reaction, an emotive<br />
spasm, an emotive state.<br />
<strong>The</strong> emotive reaction to the real film (a reaction which comprises no<br />
element of fixity) is normal or healthy, since it is reaction to the normal<br />
relative reality of cosmic phenomena. <strong>The</strong> emotive reaction to the imaginary<br />
film (which always comprises a factor of spasm) is abnormal or unhealthy; it<br />
139