01.07.2013 Views

The Supreme Doctrine - neo-alchemist

The Supreme Doctrine - neo-alchemist

The Supreme Doctrine - neo-alchemist

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

SENSATION AND SENTIMENT<br />

no motionless emotivity; there are only contractions, no spasm; there is no<br />

emotive state, but only emotions.<br />

When it is a question of an imaginary film everything is much more<br />

complicated. <strong>The</strong> relation with emotivity is no longer one-way, it exists in<br />

both directions at once. It exists first of all as it existed in the preceding case;<br />

the emotivity reacts to the imaginary images as it reacted to the real images<br />

(emotivity does not differentiate between these two kinds of images; a jealous<br />

man who vigorously imagines a scene in which his wife deceives him is as if<br />

the scene were real). But on the other hand the emotive state reacts to the<br />

elaboration of the imaginary film; if a real misfortune befalls me and saddens<br />

me I start imagining a thousand other misfortunes and I see everything in the<br />

same sombre light. Thus there is established a vicious circle of double<br />

reactions.<br />

But, in this relation between emotivity and imaginary film, another<br />

more important factor intervenes. <strong>The</strong> imaginary film resembles the real film<br />

to a certain extent; the films that I invent are necessarily elaborated with the<br />

elements that I have received in the past from the outside world; but there<br />

exists an essential difference between these two kinds of films. <strong>The</strong> real film<br />

is invented by the Cosmos, its source is the cosmic source, which is the<br />

Primary Cause of the Universe; therefore every real film is harmonic,<br />

balanced in the Whole. Its fixed centre is the Noumenon, and there could not<br />

be in this film any phenomenal fixity, it is only pure movement. On the<br />

contrary the imaginary film is centred on my Ego, on 'myself pretending to be<br />

absolutely a distinct individual'; its source, its centre, is not the immutable<br />

noumenal centre of the Cosmos, but a false, ex-centric centre. And there is, in<br />

this film, at the same time as a continual movement, a certain phenomenal<br />

fixity derived from this phenomenal centre. This is revealed by the fact that<br />

my day-dreams, if they are made of moving images, are made of images<br />

which turn ever more and more round a fixed idea; they are always more or<br />

less obsessional. My imaginary scenarios are organised in constellations or<br />

complexes, artificially coherent outside the cosmic Whole. To this<br />

phenomenal fixity corresponds a fixity in the emotive reaction, an emotive<br />

spasm, an emotive state.<br />

<strong>The</strong> emotive reaction to the real film (a reaction which comprises no<br />

element of fixity) is normal or healthy, since it is reaction to the normal<br />

relative reality of cosmic phenomena. <strong>The</strong> emotive reaction to the imaginary<br />

film (which always comprises a factor of spasm) is abnormal or unhealthy; it<br />

139

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!