03.07.2013 Views

download 21.6mb - Oil-Spill-Info.com

download 21.6mb - Oil-Spill-Info.com

download 21.6mb - Oil-Spill-Info.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

affected a very large section of the western English Channel. One month<br />

after the AMOCO CADIZ wreck, the most polluted areas were located in the<br />

coastal zones, such as the Aber zone (38.9 + 6.7 ug/l) , the Bay of<br />

Morlaix (11.5 + 5.1 ug/1), and the Bay of Lannion (10.7 + 3.0 ug/1) .<br />

Analysis of samples from various depths revealed that the contamination<br />

extended throughout the water column. The 49°N parallel roughly constituted<br />

the northern limit of pollution. Beyond this limit, oil in<br />

surface seawater was not observed (1.6 + 0.5 jug/1) . In March 1979, one<br />

year after the AMOCO CADIZ stranding, hydrocarbon concentrations<br />

returned to a normal level (below 2.0 ug/1) ; however, some residual<br />

traces of pollution were still observed near the Abers and at the bottom<br />

of the Bay of Lannion (about 2.0 ug/1).<br />

We also began a chemical follow-up study of oil pollution in marine<br />

sediments. Some data have already been presented during the international<br />

symposium held in Brest (France) in November 1979 (CNEXO, 1981;<br />

Ducreux and Marchand, 1981; Marchand, 1981; Marchand and Caprais, 1981) .<br />

In this document, results of our study are presented in three<br />

parts: (1) oil pollution in sediments collected from the western<br />

English Channel one month after the wreck, (2) specific study in the<br />

Bays of Morlaix and Lannion to determine the distribution of oil<br />

pollution in surface sediments and at various depths, and the evolution<br />

of oil contamination over one year, and (3) specific study of the Aber<br />

Wrac'h to determine oil evolution from 1978 to 1981.<br />

MATERIAL AND METHODS<br />

Surface marine sediments were collected in the western English<br />

Channel with a Shipek grab. In coastal areas, small Ekman and Hamon<br />

grabs were used. The samples, after freezer storage, were dried by<br />

using a Soxhlet apparatus or by stirring with chloroform. The organic<br />

extract was concentrated to dryness, then dissolved with 10 ml of carbon<br />

tetrachloride. A first indication of petroleum pollution in sediment<br />

was obtained through a direct analysis of nonpurified extracts by IR<br />

spectrophotometry (Perkin Elmer 397). Quantitative measurements were<br />

carried out at 2920 cm corresponding to the presence of hydrocarbons<br />

and polar <strong>com</strong>pounds. The data also reflect coextracted<br />

substances (fats, fatty acids, etc.) from sediments.<br />

spectrophotometer was calibrated with a mixture of Arabian and<br />

natural<br />

The IR<br />

Iranian<br />

light crude oils.<br />

Hydrocarbons were analyzed after cleanup of organic extracts on<br />

activated Florisil (200°C) in glass columns (15 cm x 0.6 cm i.d.).<br />

Hydrocarbons were eluted with 15 ml of carbon tetrachloride and measured<br />

by IR spectrophotometry. For some samples, organic carbon was<br />

determined with an auto-analyzer LECO WR-12. In a joint study with the<br />

French Petroleum Institute concerning the Aber Wrac'h sediments (Ducreux<br />

and Marchand, 1981), we <strong>com</strong>pared the gravimetric determinations and the<br />

IR spectrophotometr ic analysis of nonpurified organic extracts. Results<br />

of the two methods are similar (Fig. 2). We also <strong>com</strong>pared the IR<br />

spectrophotometric results obtained on nonpurified and purified organic<br />

extracts from some Aber Wrac'h sediments. In this case, correlation was<br />

significant (Fig. 3) .<br />

144

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!