03.07.2013 Views

download 21.6mb - Oil-Spill-Info.com

download 21.6mb - Oil-Spill-Info.com

download 21.6mb - Oil-Spill-Info.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

to energy sources other than acetate or HL (such as methylamines) , and<br />

sulfate reduction dominates as the significant terminal process (Winfrey<br />

and Ward, submitted). As another major objective of this study we<br />

examined terminal processes of the anaerobic food chain, which should<br />

indicate the activity of the overall food chain, for evidence of<br />

changes due to AMOCO CADIZ oiling. The processes investigated were<br />

those which dominated the food chains, principally sulfate reduction<br />

and acetate metabolism.<br />

Location of Sampling Sites<br />

METHODS<br />

Sites were selected to represent beach, estuary and salt marsh<br />

sediments in the lower intertidal region which were significantly oiled<br />

by AMOCO CADIZ pollutants. Similar sites in areas unoiled or lightly<br />

polluted were selected as controls. Locations are shown in Figure 2.<br />

Observations on the chronology of oil movements were used to determine<br />

the extent of oil impact and times at which oiling first occurred<br />

(Centre National pour 1 'Exploitation des Oceans, 1979; Gundlach and<br />

Hayes, 1978). The oiled beach site was between stations B and C at<br />

AMC-4 (Gundlach and Hayes, 1978). This site was opposite the wreck and<br />

was heavily oiled immediately after the spill. The control beach site<br />

was 100 m east of the west access to the beach at Trez-hir. This beach<br />

faces<br />

oiled<br />

the Bay<br />

estuary<br />

of Brest<br />

site was<br />

and was not reported to have been oiled.<br />

a mudflat at Aber Wrac'h, 200 m south of<br />

The<br />

the<br />

stone wall at<br />

tected in this<br />

EPA-7<br />

area<br />

(Calder,<br />

in medium<br />

et al., 1978).<br />

thickness two<br />

AMOCO CADIZ oil was de-<br />

days after the oil spill.<br />

The control estuary site was a mudflat on the south bank of Aber Ildut<br />

approximately 3 km west of Breles. <strong>Oil</strong>ing at this site was prevented<br />

by two booms extended across the mouth of the Aber. The oiled marsh<br />

site was an intertidal mudflat in lie Grande near AMC-18 (Gundlach and<br />

Hayes, 1978). Thick accumulations of AMOCO CADIZ oil reached this site<br />

by 'the eighth day following<br />

mudflat in the lie Grande<br />

the spill. The control marsh was a natural<br />

marsh, just south of the main intertidal<br />

channel. A barricade at the bridge adjoining east and west marsh areas<br />

prevented oiling at this site.<br />

Sample Collection and Processing<br />

Sediment cores were collected with hand- pushed plexiglass tubes<br />

(60 cm x 37 mm ID), stoppered, and transferred to the lab in an upright<br />

position. Cores for sediment hydrocarbon analysis were kept frozen<br />

until processing. Processing of samples for biological activities was<br />

done at the Centre Oceanologique de Bretagne in Brest or at the Station<br />

Biologique at Roscoff within 8 h after collection. All manipulations<br />

for analysis of biological activity were carried out using strict an-<br />

161

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!