03.07.2013 Views

download 21.6mb - Oil-Spill-Info.com

download 21.6mb - Oil-Spill-Info.com

download 21.6mb - Oil-Spill-Info.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2.1 Sediments and Sediment Cores (Extraction and Processing)<br />

Samples of surface sediment or specific depth interval sections of<br />

sediment cores were solvent-extracted and fractionated according to an<br />

ambient temperature solvent drying and solvent extraction procedure<br />

based on that of Brown et al. (1980) as revised by Atlas et al. (1981)<br />

and Boehm et al. (1981). The procedure, involving methanol drying and<br />

ambient temperature extraction with a methylene chloride/methanol<br />

azeotrope, is illustrated in Figure 2.1. The concentrated extract is<br />

displaced with hexane and charged to a glass absorption chromatography<br />

column (1 cm i.d.) containing 10 g fully activated (150°C) 80-100 mesh<br />

silica gel topped with 1 g 5% deactivated alumina and 1 g activated<br />

(i.e. acid washed) copper powder. The column, which is wet packed in<br />

methylene chloride, is rinsed with this solvent followed by hexane. A<br />

0.5 ml volume of extract is charged to the column and eluted with<br />

hexane (17 ml, f]_) » hexane: methylene chloride (21 ml, f 2) , and<br />

methanol (20 ml, f 3) . The fractions are collected separately, reduced<br />

in volume, desulfurized using an activated (1 N HC1) copper powder<br />

slurry, and an aliquot weighed on a Cahn electrobalance. The f^ and<br />

f2 fractions are then analyzed by fused silica capillary gas chromatography<br />

(FSCGC flame ionization detector) and a selected set further<br />

scrutinized by gas chromatographic mass spectrometry. FSCGC analysis<br />

determined the overall <strong>com</strong>position of the sample by appraisal of the<br />

distribution of resolved (peaks) and unresolved (hump) features,<br />

as well as the specific quantities of individual n-alkane (C^g to C32)<br />

and isoprenoid (C15 to C20) <strong>com</strong>pounds. GC/MS/<strong>com</strong>puter analyses focused<br />

on the list of saturated and aromatic <strong>com</strong>pounds presented in Table 2 to<br />

confirm the identities of <strong>com</strong>pounds or to quantify minor, but important<br />

"marker" <strong>com</strong>pounds.<br />

Table 3.<br />

Details of the GC and GC/MS analytical procedures are presented in<br />

Quantification of GC traces was according to the internal standard<br />

method wherein quantities of individual hydrocarbons are <strong>com</strong>puted.<br />

Several other GC-derived parameters were routinely calculated on sample<br />

data. One of these was the n-alkane to isoprenoid ratio (ALK/ISO) in<br />

the C13 - C19 range:<br />

ArK/Tsn =<br />

'<br />

n ~ C 14 + "-Cis + n-Ci e. + n C, 7 + n-Ci a<br />

1380 + 1450 + 1650 + 1710 + 1812 a<br />

a GC retention indices of isoprenoids: 1450 = farnesane, 1710 =<br />

pristane, 1812 = phytane.<br />

This ratio, beginning at ^7 in the reference oil is quickly<br />

decreased due to preferential bacterial degradation of n-alkanes<br />

versus the branched isoprenoids.<br />

The carbon preference index (CPI) , the ratio of odd chain alkanes<br />

to even chain alkanes in the n-C26 to n-c 31 range, is defined as<br />

follows:<br />

CPI =<br />

2(n-C ?7 + n-Coq)<br />

n-C 26<br />

'+ 2n-C 2 Q<br />

+ n-C 30<br />

38

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!