20.07.2013 Views

Beyond Time - Linguistics - University of California, Berkeley

Beyond Time - Linguistics - University of California, Berkeley

Beyond Time - Linguistics - University of California, Berkeley

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

verbs, the pathways <strong>of</strong> development from -a- to pasts, anteriors, perfectives, and presents,<br />

might all fall in line with the cross-linguistic generalizations in table 3.7.<br />

It is worth noting that Totela is not unique in its attention to situation completion or<br />

culmination. Kershner (2002) reports similar reference to completion in Chisukwa (M.202,<br />

Malawi), although the tense/aspect morphemes involved differ. Lusaamia (JE.34) and<br />

Luwanga (JE.32), discussed in 3.2.3, also have a marker -ire that pays crucial attention<br />

to nuclear completion (Botne 2010). Completion semantics also seem likely to be at play<br />

in other Bantu languages where “anterior” marking is associated with vagueness or ambiguity<br />

between past situations and present states. The stability <strong>of</strong> the categories, despite<br />

constantly evolving means <strong>of</strong> morphological expression, suggests that the notion <strong>of</strong> nucleus<br />

completion is basic to Bantu tense and aspect; this is likely closely related to the prevalence<br />

<strong>of</strong> change-<strong>of</strong>-state verbs.<br />

In any case, the Bantu situation is complex. Even the segmentally identical -a- markers<br />

in Totela and its close relatives Ila and Tonga (see 3.4.1 below) – although all have a flavor<br />

<strong>of</strong> hodiernality – have varying functions, interactions with situation type, and co-occurrence<br />

possibilities with various aspectual markers. As elsewhere in Bantu (see e.g. Nurse 2008),<br />

there is a fair amount <strong>of</strong> volatility in the semantic and pragmatic development <strong>of</strong> TAM<br />

markers. What they all appear to have in common is varying interpretations <strong>of</strong> past, present,<br />

or future according to situation type and context. The Ila and Tonga forms, and the puzzles<br />

they pose, are discussed briefly in the next sections.<br />

3.4.1 -a- in related languages<br />

3.4.1.1 Tonga (M.64)<br />

Hopgood (1940:7) labels Tonga -a- as “tense” but gives it a definition matching that typically<br />

given for the perfect/anterior:<br />

This commonly denotes an action completed but with a definite bearing on the<br />

present. If for example I ask “Where is So-and-so?” the answer may be Waya,<br />

i.e. He has gone, he is no longer here (Hopgood 1940:7).<br />

Tonga -a-has temporal interpretations common for Bantu anteriors: present with change<strong>of</strong>-state<br />

verbs (158)–(159) and most stative-like verbs (160)–(161); and past (with present<br />

relevance) otherwise (162). Note that more frequently than in Totela, -a- is used with statives<br />

and perception verbs with a present-state meaning: ndabona (in Totela, typically ‘I saw/I<br />

have seen’) means both ‘I have seen’ and ‘I see’ (Hopgood 1940:11). 28<br />

28 Although the present stative reading is obtainable with state verbs in Totela, as in 114) and (115), when<br />

the state is viewed as inceptive/expressing a change, other forms such as -ite and -la- are more commonly<br />

used when expressing present statives. Examples in Hopgood (1940) show that this is at least sometimes<br />

the case in Tonga, as well. For example, ‘my head hurts’ is mutwe ulacisa, with present-tense marking.<br />

152

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!