20.07.2013 Views

Beyond Time - Linguistics - University of California, Berkeley

Beyond Time - Linguistics - University of California, Berkeley

Beyond Time - Linguistics - University of California, Berkeley

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

speakers use -ite to structure information, manipulating the question under discussion. Relevance<br />

is particularly clear in orientation scenes. In using -ite with verbs in introducing<br />

characters, narrators communicate that the particular attributes or situations described are<br />

relevant for the story to come. Orientation examples are shown in (375) and (376) above.<br />

Other -ite uses also show relevance effects. For example (381), repeated from (379a),<br />

introduces a character who will serve as a foil. The old hag’s spying will prove the undoing<br />

<strong>of</strong> the main character in his deceit, and is thus introduced as important for the ensuing<br />

action.<br />

(381) Nàkó àkàchèmbèlè kàlìmúbwènè<br />

nako<br />

akachembele ka-li-mu-bwene<br />

com.cl12.dem cl12.old.hag cl12-pres.stat-3sg-see.stat<br />

‘And that old hag saw him [was watching him]’ (ZT2009NarrB3.CN Sinjoli<br />

naChacha)<br />

-ite also appears frequently in quoted speech in narrative, much as it appears in everyday<br />

discourse. In (382), for example, -ite seems to be used because the speaker is making an<br />

observation that is very relevant to the current context, explaining the problems <strong>of</strong> the<br />

speaker’s child. In general, -lowa ‘bewitch, do witchcraft against’, occurs more commonly in<br />

a non-ite form. The statement with -ite is a claim about the character and actions <strong>of</strong> her<br />

interlocutor, and the act <strong>of</strong> witchcraft becomes an attribution, rather than just an activity.<br />

It is relevant to answering several discourse questions: first, ‘what is responsible for my<br />

children’s problems?’ and second, ‘what accounts for my judgment <strong>of</strong> your character (and<br />

ensuing actions)?’<br />

(382) “Kántì íwè ndìwé ùlówètè yôyù mwáànángù íwè!”<br />

“kanti iwe ndi-iwe u-low-ete yoyu mwaana-angu<br />

kanti<br />

iwe!”<br />

2sg.pron cop-2sg.pron 2sg-witch(v)-stat cl1.dem child-1poss<br />

2sg.pron<br />

“‘What?! You, it was you, you were the one who was witching my child, you!”’<br />

(ZT2009NarrB3.CN Sinjoli naChacha)<br />

In contrast, in (383), -ikuta ‘become full’ is not used in its stativized -ite version (-ikusi),<br />

although such a use might be acceptable in that temporal context. There are at least<br />

two reasons why -ite may not have been chosen, one temporal and one relevance based.<br />

Temporally, this sentence seems to emphasize the change <strong>of</strong> state rather than the current<br />

state: the speakers have not yet become full (the point <strong>of</strong> nuclear completion in the predicate<br />

-ikuta ‘become full’). The relevance-based motivation for this temporal representation may<br />

be that the food (and its inadequacy), and not just the speakers’ state, is what is under<br />

discussion, and question about whether the friend is hungry does not directly represent the<br />

285

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!