20.07.2013 Views

Beyond Time - Linguistics - University of California, Berkeley

Beyond Time - Linguistics - University of California, Berkeley

Beyond Time - Linguistics - University of California, Berkeley

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

D.60 (e.g. Ha), and in some M languages <strong>of</strong> Zambia (Nurse 2008:205-206; Nurse 2006:193-<br />

194); M languages with -la- listed in Nurse (2008) are M.42 (Bemba), M.54 (Lamba), and<br />

M.64 (Totela’s close relative Tonga). 31 Its most common functions are marking present or<br />

progressive-like meanings, and marking “disjunctive” focus, where the focus is on the verb<br />

itself rather than its object(s). In Nurse’s words,<br />

Conjunctive verb forms focus on a post-verbal complement/constituent, such<br />

as object, adverbial, second verb, or new material. [They contrast] with disjunctive<br />

forms, which indicate that there is no special relationship between<br />

the verb and a following constituent. Emphasis is on the verb lexeme or one <strong>of</strong><br />

its categories. The verb <strong>of</strong>ten stands alone following constituents being optional<br />

(Nurse 2008:116).<br />

For example, in Bemba, contrasts such as the following can be made with -la-: 32<br />

(248) a. tu-peepa sekelééti<br />

1pl-smoke cigarettes<br />

‘we smoke cigarettes, not a pipe’<br />

b. bá-mó bá-la-lyá ínsoka<br />

cl2-some cl2-pf-eat.prs snake<br />

‘some people actually eat snakes’ (Sharman 1956:40 in Güldemann 2003:339)<br />

The difference between these forms does not lie in marking <strong>of</strong> identificational focus,<br />

which Kiss (1998:245) notes must represent “exhaustive identification” <strong>of</strong> the entire subset <strong>of</strong><br />

entities for which the predicate is true. Instead, they differ in the scope <strong>of</strong> focus. Disjunctive<br />

-la- is, in many languages, a marker <strong>of</strong> “predication focus” – i.e. focus on a lexical verb or<br />

“predication operator” marking tense, aspect, mood, or polarity (Güldemann 2003). Focus<br />

on an argument or adjunct, found with -Ø- forms, is called “term focus” in Güldemann<br />

(2003:332). Hyman & Watters (1984) note that tenses and forms otherwise not intrinsically<br />

focused – in contrast to e.g. imperatives, progressives, negatives, etc., which have intrinsic<br />

focus – are where the morphologically-marked focus contrast originates. The Totela case<br />

confirms this.<br />

In languages where -la- appears to be purely a marker <strong>of</strong> predication focus, it may cooccur<br />

with a variety <strong>of</strong> tenses and aspects, as in Ha (JD.66):<br />

(249) a. ba-Ø-ra-rim-a<br />

3pl-Ø-foc-cultivate-fv<br />

‘they cultivate’<br />

b. ba-á-ra-rím-ye<br />

3pl-p2-foc-cultivate-fv<br />

‘they cultivated’ (Nurse 2006:193)<br />

31Southern Bantu zone S languages have a -(y)a- vs. -Ø- focus contrast (Güldemann 2003:337-338), which<br />

may also be related to -la- and -Ø-.<br />

32Glosses are modified from Güldemann (2003). pf stands for “predication focus”.<br />

202

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!