Scientism and Values.pdf - Ludwig von Mises Institute
Scientism and Values.pdf - Ludwig von Mises Institute
Scientism and Values.pdf - Ludwig von Mises Institute
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
x Introduction<br />
not convince them. Indeed, we can always startle our positivistic<br />
friends in the social sciences by asking them to name just one<br />
major policy decision or law that came about, against the popular<br />
<strong>and</strong> political preferences for it, on the strength of quantitative<br />
data. Can we recapture the proper-i.e., most fertile-balance<br />
between elements of measurement, of quality, <strong>and</strong> of form in<br />
the study of social man?<br />
Over a number of years participants in this symposium, <strong>and</strong><br />
others, have shown, in their individual publications, increasing<br />
concern with the harm done to the true study of man, especially<br />
as a social being, by a form of scientism that takes various disguises<br />
of strict scientificalness. It is. not merely neopositivism, which, by<br />
the way, has been criticized by a number of· able men; it is also<br />
more than a cult of quantification. <strong>Scientism</strong> implies a cynical<br />
world view-in the original meaning of the word: it is a doglike<br />
view of man, or shall we say riatlike? Man is best understood, so<br />
the scientistic expert holds, when seen from th'e level of a rodent<br />
eager to learn the ins <strong>and</strong> outs of a maze. He can be conditioned<br />
to put up with almost anything the few wise designers of the maze<br />
have mapped out for him.<br />
And yet a critical attitude toward scientism is not to be confused<br />
with an antievolutionary position. On the contrary, we see<br />
scientistic sociologists <strong>and</strong> anthropologists refuse to learn from<br />
research on animals because it might challenge their creed of environmental<br />
determinism. As A. L. Kroeber observed not long<br />
ago, 3 many of his colleagues in America are studiedly ignorant of<br />
the work of the ethologists, including such renowned men as Karl<br />
<strong>von</strong> Frisch <strong>and</strong> Konrad Lorenz, who explore species-specific innate<br />
behavior patterns.<br />
Thus, we should ask just which aspects of the presocial <strong>and</strong><br />
nonsocial sciences appeal to those afflicted with scientism.? And<br />
why are they enthralled <strong>and</strong> to what effect? The scientistic students<br />
of social man have isolated their field from meaningful •reality<br />
by an arbitrary barrier of methodology. "What we cannot study<br />
does not exist-for the time being." This was done partly 'by<br />
reserving the 'labels: "scientific" <strong>and</strong> "scholarly" (wissenscha/tlich)<br />
for a few approaches' to reality which laymen <strong>and</strong> social' scientists