22.07.2013 Views

Scientism and Values.pdf - Ludwig von Mises Institute

Scientism and Values.pdf - Ludwig von Mises Institute

Scientism and Values.pdf - Ludwig von Mises Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

56 <strong>Scientism</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Values</strong><br />

have come to my attention. In an article entitled "Social Scientist:<br />

Man Between," Robert Redfield, with the wisdom <strong>and</strong> modesty<br />

those who enjoyed the privilege of his friendship expected of him,<br />

acknowledged the differences between the social scientist <strong>and</strong> the<br />

student of the humanities. 9 In psychology, Abraham Maslow has<br />

courageously <strong>and</strong>, in my outsider's opinion, successfully tried to<br />

inquire into phenomena in which the imitation of the methods of<br />

the physicist is simply inconceivable.<br />

When I say that physics <strong>and</strong> biology are sciences, I do not mean<br />

that in any given science at a given time there are not stubborn,<br />

unresolved problems about which scientists are in doubt. These<br />

problems no doubt exist, <strong>and</strong> they are no doubt the source of disagreements.<br />

But these disagreements seem to arise for the most<br />

part, at least in the Western regions of the science, so to speak,<br />

where the explorers are opening the l<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> no settlement has<br />

yet taken place. Nor do they seem to be the source of the kinds<br />

of schools or factions that we find in the studies of man.<br />

I am aware that in biology there are unresolved problems that<br />

seem to be cause for factionalism <strong>and</strong> cannot be said to be frontier<br />

problems: there is a minority that holds that teleology <strong>and</strong> vitalism<br />

are unresolved problems-if they are two, <strong>and</strong> not essentially<br />

one. The outsider is in no position to judge the merits of the solutions<br />

proposed for these problems when they are formulated<br />

within the domain of biology. All he can do is suspend judgment<br />

on the ground that if these problems have been resolved successfully,<br />

it is difficult to see why reputable scientists continue to reject<br />

the solutions offered. May not the reason be that these stubborn<br />

problems are philosophic, <strong>and</strong> not scientific, <strong>and</strong> seem to<br />

arise from causes similar to those to which the factionalism of the<br />

disciplines of man can be traced, viz., the effort to deal with biological<br />

subject matter in the way in which the physicist deals with<br />

his? However that may be, when allowance is made for these disagreements,<br />

it still can be said in fairness that the factionalism that<br />

is the normal condition in the studies of man does not exist in<br />

anything like the same degree in biology.10<br />

The preceding argument should carry conviction, although it is<br />

external to the disciplines themselves. When it is advanced, stu-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!