Scientism and Values.pdf - Ludwig von Mises Institute
Scientism and Values.pdf - Ludwig von Mises Institute
Scientism and Values.pdf - Ludwig von Mises Institute
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
56 <strong>Scientism</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Values</strong><br />
have come to my attention. In an article entitled "Social Scientist:<br />
Man Between," Robert Redfield, with the wisdom <strong>and</strong> modesty<br />
those who enjoyed the privilege of his friendship expected of him,<br />
acknowledged the differences between the social scientist <strong>and</strong> the<br />
student of the humanities. 9 In psychology, Abraham Maslow has<br />
courageously <strong>and</strong>, in my outsider's opinion, successfully tried to<br />
inquire into phenomena in which the imitation of the methods of<br />
the physicist is simply inconceivable.<br />
When I say that physics <strong>and</strong> biology are sciences, I do not mean<br />
that in any given science at a given time there are not stubborn,<br />
unresolved problems about which scientists are in doubt. These<br />
problems no doubt exist, <strong>and</strong> they are no doubt the source of disagreements.<br />
But these disagreements seem to arise for the most<br />
part, at least in the Western regions of the science, so to speak,<br />
where the explorers are opening the l<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> no settlement has<br />
yet taken place. Nor do they seem to be the source of the kinds<br />
of schools or factions that we find in the studies of man.<br />
I am aware that in biology there are unresolved problems that<br />
seem to be cause for factionalism <strong>and</strong> cannot be said to be frontier<br />
problems: there is a minority that holds that teleology <strong>and</strong> vitalism<br />
are unresolved problems-if they are two, <strong>and</strong> not essentially<br />
one. The outsider is in no position to judge the merits of the solutions<br />
proposed for these problems when they are formulated<br />
within the domain of biology. All he can do is suspend judgment<br />
on the ground that if these problems have been resolved successfully,<br />
it is difficult to see why reputable scientists continue to reject<br />
the solutions offered. May not the reason be that these stubborn<br />
problems are philosophic, <strong>and</strong> not scientific, <strong>and</strong> seem to<br />
arise from causes similar to those to which the factionalism of the<br />
disciplines of man can be traced, viz., the effort to deal with biological<br />
subject matter in the way in which the physicist deals with<br />
his? However that may be, when allowance is made for these disagreements,<br />
it still can be said in fairness that the factionalism that<br />
is the normal condition in the studies of man does not exist in<br />
anything like the same degree in biology.10<br />
The preceding argument should carry conviction, although it is<br />
external to the disciplines themselves. When it is advanced, stu-