22.07.2013 Views

Scientism and Values.pdf - Ludwig von Mises Institute

Scientism and Values.pdf - Ludwig von Mises Institute

Scientism and Values.pdf - Ludwig von Mises Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Science <strong>and</strong> the Studies of Man<br />

IV<br />

Let me begin with two prefatory remarks. The first is that<br />

naturalism is not a school of thought in the sense that idealism<br />

or phenomenology is. It is a conviction about the universe that<br />

is elaborated in diverse "vays. "Orthodox" naturalism, so to speak,<br />

adds to the proposition that nothing happens except by natural<br />

means another proposition, namely, that the only way to know<br />

what happens is to bring it within the purvie"v of science. This<br />

second proposition has been elaborated with gre.at care by positivists<br />

<strong>and</strong> instrumentalists who are committed to belief in "the<br />

unity of science." There are, however, naturalists who do not<br />

accept the doctrine of the unity of science.<br />

The second prefatory remark is this: It is widely held today<br />

that naturalis,m is one of the indispensable foundations of science.<br />

I heard an academic psychologist recently assert, with a warmth<br />

one does not expect of a scientist, that psychology is, possible<br />

only on a naturalistic foundation. However widespread this belief<br />

may be, it is false. Scientific activity of the most rigorous kind is<br />

consistent with an indeterminate number of philosophical convictions.<br />

The business of the scientist is to discover the invariant<br />

relations operative in the domain of his competence. What is to<br />

be found beyond the purview of scientific inquiry he need not<br />

make any assumptions about. He does not even need to believe,<br />

as has been alleged, that nature is through <strong>and</strong> through governed<br />

by the order that is expressed in scientific laws. When he espouses<br />

naturalism, his views do not have the authority that his scientific<br />

hypotheses have. When scientists speak of mathematics or geometry<br />

as the alphabet of nature, as the men of the seventeenth<br />

century did, they speak as philosophers; they do not speak as<br />

scientists. A scientist can say, with'Kant, that nature is the realm<br />

of law. But if he does, he must stop there, <strong>and</strong> he does not even<br />

have the right, qua scientist, to say that what we ordinarily call<br />

nature, the spatiotemporal world, is completely governed by law.<br />

Of course, in his inquiries he discovers laws-these are what he<br />

73

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!