22.07.2013 Views

Scientism and Values.pdf - Ludwig von Mises Institute

Scientism and Values.pdf - Ludwig von Mises Institute

Scientism and Values.pdf - Ludwig von Mises Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Objectivity <strong>and</strong> Social Science 27<br />

Take any action allowed to be vicious: wilful murder, for instance.<br />

Examine it in all lights <strong>and</strong> see if you can find that matter of fact, or<br />

real existence, which you call vice. In whichever way you take it, you<br />

find only certain passions, motives, volitions <strong>and</strong> thoughts. There is<br />

no other matter of fact in the case. The vice entirely escapes you, as<br />

long as you consider the object. You never can find it, till you turn<br />

your reflexion into your own breast, <strong>and</strong> find a sentiment of disapprobation,<br />

which arises in you, towards this action. Here is a matter<br />

of fact; but 'tis the object of feeling, not of reason. It lies in yourself,<br />

not in the object. So that when you pronounce any action or character<br />

to be vicious, you mean nothing, but that from the constitution of<br />

your nature you have a feeling or sentiment of blame from the contemplation<br />

of it. Vice <strong>and</strong> virtue, therefore, may be compar'd to<br />

sounds, colours, heat <strong>and</strong> cold, which, according to modern philosophy,<br />

are not qualities in objects, but perceptions in the mind. 5<br />

In another passage H ume makes it clear that according to this<br />

same modern philosophy, vice <strong>and</strong> virtue cannot consist in relations<br />

any more than they can in qualities of objects. But if they<br />

do not consist in either qualities or relations, the question arises<br />

whether they exist at all. The thing that John Donne saw when<br />

over three hundred years. ago he looked at the direction modern<br />

science was taking <strong>and</strong> wrote:<br />

'Tis all in pieces, all coherence gone<br />

All just supply <strong>and</strong> all relation....<br />

Sight is the noblest sense of anyone,<br />

Yet sight hath only colour to feed on,<br />

And colour is decaid; summer's robe growes<br />

Duskie, <strong>and</strong> like an oft dyed garment showes.<br />

Our blushing red, which used in cheeks· to spred<br />

Is inward sunk, <strong>and</strong> only our soules, are red 6<br />

the modern social scientist has not yet seen in spite of his concern<br />

with physical science as a model of what all science should be.<br />

The view that color <strong>and</strong> odor <strong>and</strong> sound <strong>and</strong> taste <strong>and</strong> tactile<br />

qualities are all in the subject, none in the object, if any, that<br />

somehow gives rise to them, is ancient. Montaigne summarizes this<br />

view in a classic statement at the end of his famous "Apology for

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!