Scientism and Values.pdf - Ludwig von Mises Institute
Scientism and Values.pdf - Ludwig von Mises Institute
Scientism and Values.pdf - Ludwig von Mises Institute
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Objectivity <strong>and</strong> Social Science 37<br />
madman would mock at such things. There is abundant evidence that<br />
this is the universal feeling about the ancient customs of one's<br />
country. 14<br />
It is necessary only to make a few substitutions such as that of<br />
"science" for "nation" or "country" to see how closely this statement<br />
made more than two thous<strong>and</strong> years ago fits the modern<br />
case. Most of us today worship science. There has never been a<br />
time when so many people-communists <strong>and</strong> anticommunists,<br />
national socialists <strong>and</strong> antinational socialists-were joined in one<br />
worship <strong>and</strong> so convinced that the thing they worship is the thing<br />
that will bring everybody the good things of life <strong>and</strong> therefore<br />
ought to be worshipped.<br />
Herodotus, it is clear, would have understood how it is that the<br />
problem of Antigone <strong>and</strong> Creon, which we have outlined above,<br />
is a perennial problem <strong>and</strong> how this problem arises out of the<br />
nature of society <strong>and</strong> the effort to create a rational social order,<br />
with or without the aid of social science.<br />
Now we cannot say that for a person to communicate with himself<br />
or othe'rs he must have complete underst<strong>and</strong>ing of a subject,<br />
for it is possible that every subject in the world is connected with<br />
every other, <strong>and</strong> complete underst<strong>and</strong>ing or objectivity in this case<br />
would call for knowing the whole truth about the world <strong>and</strong><br />
everything in it. But we can say <strong>and</strong> we can know as certainly as<br />
we can know anything that we can't say something in one sentence<br />
<strong>and</strong> deny it in another <strong>and</strong> make sense. If what we have said is<br />
true, Miss Benedict does not make sense of a rational kind. The<br />
kind of sense that she makes is of the irrational propag<strong>and</strong>istic<br />
kind, a kind bound to lead away from rather than toward the<br />
rational social order which Miss Benedict professes to want <strong>and</strong><br />
that all of us ought to want <strong>and</strong> work for.<br />
IV<br />
We do not have the space here to report <strong>and</strong> discuss in any<br />
detail the allegations of social scientists concerning methods of<br />
eliminating or counteracting bias in their work. The dodges are