Scientism and Values.pdf - Ludwig von Mises Institute
Scientism and Values.pdf - Ludwig von Mises Institute
Scientism and Values.pdf - Ludwig von Mises Institute
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
132 <strong>Scientism</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Values</strong><br />
sible, may try to sort out specific units from a range or cluster of<br />
phenomena <strong>and</strong> call their interdependency, their functioning, a<br />
system. This does not require conscious behavior on the part of<br />
those units, or of a majority of them, as members (<strong>and</strong> in terms)<br />
of a system. The "system," its functional value, may have come<br />
about by natural selection. We might think here also, for instance,<br />
of the nervous system or certain ecological systems made up of<br />
different plants <strong>and</strong> lower organisms.<br />
And even when we speak of "American society," for the most<br />
part we have a system before us that functions in all its complexity<br />
on a level of mutual consciousness <strong>and</strong> recognition not very much<br />
higher than the systems mentioned above. Except for a few intellectuals<br />
perhaps, most Americans, whose daily activities over centuries<br />
helped to create a complex <strong>and</strong> highly productive socioeconomic<br />
system, did not, <strong>and</strong> do not now, go about their business all<br />
the time thinking of their social system.<br />
By contrast, there are social systems that are systems precisely<br />
because of a theory of a specific system that preceded them in time.<br />
They remain functioning systems only as long as most of their<br />
members remain intensely conscious of the theory that has welded<br />
them into a system. Any complex group of human beings performing<br />
a highly specialized service, whether it be Lloyd's of London,<br />
an opera company, or the general staff of an army, might be mentioned<br />
as illustrations. Yet again, there is a difference between the<br />
social system of Lloyd's, a modern opera hous.e, <strong>and</strong> the German<br />
General Staff. Unlike the former, which grew gradually by trial<br />
<strong>and</strong> error, the German General Staff was an articulate <strong>and</strong> functioning<br />
social system mostly by virtue of all its members' constant<br />
<strong>and</strong> intens,e dedication to the theory which had put the system<br />
into existence.<br />
If these different meanings of the term "social system" are confused,<br />
naive yet ambitious legislators <strong>and</strong> policy-makers often may<br />
come to expect from "society" a continuous performance on a<br />
level of cohesion <strong>and</strong> dedication which we could expect only in<br />
the best circumstances from a system of the type illustrated by the<br />
General Staff.