22.07.2013 Views

Scientism and Values.pdf - Ludwig von Mises Institute

Scientism and Values.pdf - Ludwig von Mises Institute

Scientism and Values.pdf - Ludwig von Mises Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

132 <strong>Scientism</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Values</strong><br />

sible, may try to sort out specific units from a range or cluster of<br />

phenomena <strong>and</strong> call their interdependency, their functioning, a<br />

system. This does not require conscious behavior on the part of<br />

those units, or of a majority of them, as members (<strong>and</strong> in terms)<br />

of a system. The "system," its functional value, may have come<br />

about by natural selection. We might think here also, for instance,<br />

of the nervous system or certain ecological systems made up of<br />

different plants <strong>and</strong> lower organisms.<br />

And even when we speak of "American society," for the most<br />

part we have a system before us that functions in all its complexity<br />

on a level of mutual consciousness <strong>and</strong> recognition not very much<br />

higher than the systems mentioned above. Except for a few intellectuals<br />

perhaps, most Americans, whose daily activities over centuries<br />

helped to create a complex <strong>and</strong> highly productive socioeconomic<br />

system, did not, <strong>and</strong> do not now, go about their business all<br />

the time thinking of their social system.<br />

By contrast, there are social systems that are systems precisely<br />

because of a theory of a specific system that preceded them in time.<br />

They remain functioning systems only as long as most of their<br />

members remain intensely conscious of the theory that has welded<br />

them into a system. Any complex group of human beings performing<br />

a highly specialized service, whether it be Lloyd's of London,<br />

an opera company, or the general staff of an army, might be mentioned<br />

as illustrations. Yet again, there is a difference between the<br />

social system of Lloyd's, a modern opera hous.e, <strong>and</strong> the German<br />

General Staff. Unlike the former, which grew gradually by trial<br />

<strong>and</strong> error, the German General Staff was an articulate <strong>and</strong> functioning<br />

social system mostly by virtue of all its members' constant<br />

<strong>and</strong> intens,e dedication to the theory which had put the system<br />

into existence.<br />

If these different meanings of the term "social system" are confused,<br />

naive yet ambitious legislators <strong>and</strong> policy-makers often may<br />

come to expect from "society" a continuous performance on a<br />

level of cohesion <strong>and</strong> dedication which we could expect only in<br />

the best circumstances from a system of the type illustrated by the<br />

General Staff.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!