Scientism and Values.pdf - Ludwig von Mises Institute
Scientism and Values.pdf - Ludwig von Mises Institute
Scientism and Values.pdf - Ludwig von Mises Institute
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
252 <strong>Scientism</strong> <strong>and</strong> J1alues<br />
ances. This unification requires <strong>and</strong> justifies identifying science<br />
with techniques of manipulation, letting the techniques determine<br />
the valid limits of social research, working for an integration of<br />
the outlook <strong>and</strong> resources of social scientists, <strong>and</strong> penalizing those<br />
who resist convergence.<br />
2. A n attempt to spread information about the potency of the<br />
models of social science. Notational systems, it may be made reasonably<br />
clear, are efficient implements for action, effective weapons<br />
for the maintenance or destruction of power, likely to become<br />
ever sharper in application.<br />
3. A gradual enlargement of the area considered suitable for<br />
scientific operations so that ever more tracts of life may be ordered<br />
objectively. The depreciation of two major ideals would follow<br />
from this activity: (1) the ideal that agreement should be reached,<br />
however temporarily, by a process of political negotiation; (2) the<br />
ideal that conflicts should be tentatively settled by means of<br />
human-that is, value-ascribing-discourse, by dialectical social<br />
philosophy.<br />
As it becomes possible to place goals into a frame within which<br />
they may be objectively perceived, within which those value<br />
conflicts left inconclusive by parliamentary politics may be settled<br />
with finality, thanks to a neutral "administration of things," the<br />
ends of life <strong>and</strong> action are removed from the traditional process<br />
of political compromise <strong>and</strong> dialectical discussion. Such a process<br />
must appear increasingly specious, being predicated on the possibility<br />
of human rationality, on the conviction that language may<br />
be informative <strong>and</strong> can make genuine knowledge available. When<br />
it is held, to the contrary, that language functions merely to secure<br />
or prevent action, to maintain or destroy an equilibrium, to create<br />
or undermine consensus, parliamentarianism can be only atmospherically<br />
useful.<br />
The assumption that knowledge is gained only by language<br />
which has operational meaning <strong>and</strong> that all other language rationalizes<br />
th.e drive for power or serves to sublimate aggressions <strong>and</strong><br />
extend pleasures leads not only to the devaluation of political settlements,<br />
but also to the rejection of artists, mystics, <strong>and</strong> philosophers<br />
as collaborators in the perennial search for final truth.