22.07.2013 Views

Scientism and Values.pdf - Ludwig von Mises Institute

Scientism and Values.pdf - Ludwig von Mises Institute

Scientism and Values.pdf - Ludwig von Mises Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

252 <strong>Scientism</strong> <strong>and</strong> J1alues<br />

ances. This unification requires <strong>and</strong> justifies identifying science<br />

with techniques of manipulation, letting the techniques determine<br />

the valid limits of social research, working for an integration of<br />

the outlook <strong>and</strong> resources of social scientists, <strong>and</strong> penalizing those<br />

who resist convergence.<br />

2. A n attempt to spread information about the potency of the<br />

models of social science. Notational systems, it may be made reasonably<br />

clear, are efficient implements for action, effective weapons<br />

for the maintenance or destruction of power, likely to become<br />

ever sharper in application.<br />

3. A gradual enlargement of the area considered suitable for<br />

scientific operations so that ever more tracts of life may be ordered<br />

objectively. The depreciation of two major ideals would follow<br />

from this activity: (1) the ideal that agreement should be reached,<br />

however temporarily, by a process of political negotiation; (2) the<br />

ideal that conflicts should be tentatively settled by means of<br />

human-that is, value-ascribing-discourse, by dialectical social<br />

philosophy.<br />

As it becomes possible to place goals into a frame within which<br />

they may be objectively perceived, within which those value<br />

conflicts left inconclusive by parliamentary politics may be settled<br />

with finality, thanks to a neutral "administration of things," the<br />

ends of life <strong>and</strong> action are removed from the traditional process<br />

of political compromise <strong>and</strong> dialectical discussion. Such a process<br />

must appear increasingly specious, being predicated on the possibility<br />

of human rationality, on the conviction that language may<br />

be informative <strong>and</strong> can make genuine knowledge available. When<br />

it is held, to the contrary, that language functions merely to secure<br />

or prevent action, to maintain or destroy an equilibrium, to create<br />

or undermine consensus, parliamentarianism can be only atmospherically<br />

useful.<br />

The assumption that knowledge is gained only by language<br />

which has operational meaning <strong>and</strong> that all other language rationalizes<br />

th.e drive for power or serves to sublimate aggressions <strong>and</strong><br />

extend pleasures leads not only to the devaluation of political settlements,<br />

but also to the rejection of artists, mystics, <strong>and</strong> philosophers<br />

as collaborators in the perennial search for final truth.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!