Scientism and Values.pdf - Ludwig von Mises Institute
Scientism and Values.pdf - Ludwig von Mises Institute
Scientism and Values.pdf - Ludwig von Mises Institute
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
224 <strong>Scientism</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Values</strong><br />
example, complex international problems can he swept conveniently<br />
under the rug by reducing international relations to economic<br />
equations: by assisting the underdeveloped countries economically,<br />
the giver wins, if not their good will, then at least a<br />
measure of toleration <strong>and</strong>, in the bargain, fosters the growth of<br />
democracy, which, it is alleged, is correlated closely with the rise<br />
of average st<strong>and</strong>ards of living. By ignoring unwieldy cultural factors<br />
<strong>and</strong> deep-seated antagonisms to Western peoples <strong>and</strong> values,<br />
one simplifies the problem of, let us say, India's place in what is<br />
called euphemistically the "free world": the West, by adding just<br />
the right amount of investment capital to India's government..<br />
directed economic development, can secure the survival, in India,<br />
of parliamentary government <strong>and</strong>, in world politics, assist India<br />
in becoming a counterweight to Red China. Proposals for such a<br />
Western "policy" toward India are loaded with eye-filling <strong>and</strong> vig..<br />
orously formulated statistics. The trouble with this neat solution<br />
-which, in the context of scientific economics, is perfectly plausible-is<br />
that the soul of India is. not the soul of America, that Indians<br />
cannot be equated with Chinese on the basis of per capita<br />
economic productivity, <strong>and</strong> that, strictly speaking, India is not a<br />
nation.<br />
III<br />
Since the social sciences are concerned with human action, an<br />
explanation of data can hardly be satisfying <strong>and</strong> valid unless it relates<br />
"objective" social phenomena to human purpose, intention,<br />
<strong>and</strong> values. This approach is underst<strong>and</strong>ably at odds with that of<br />
the natural scientist. It is also at odds with the idea of a centrally<br />
planned <strong>and</strong>, therefore, centrally controlled society. The obstacle<br />
to centralized, "scientific" planning is individual idiosyncrasy; i.e.,<br />
individual purpose, intention, <strong>and</strong> values. The most expeditious<br />
way around this obstacle is to assert that individual purpose, intention,<br />
<strong>and</strong> values are scientifically irrelevant or trivial <strong>and</strong> impervious<br />
to measurement <strong>and</strong>, therefore, should be left out of account.<br />
Likewise, it is argued that historical institutions, because they are<br />
the traditional repository of purpose, intention, <strong>and</strong> values, are not