22.07.2013 Views

Scientism and Values.pdf - Ludwig von Mises Institute

Scientism and Values.pdf - Ludwig von Mises Institute

Scientism and Values.pdf - Ludwig von Mises Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

224 <strong>Scientism</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Values</strong><br />

example, complex international problems can he swept conveniently<br />

under the rug by reducing international relations to economic<br />

equations: by assisting the underdeveloped countries economically,<br />

the giver wins, if not their good will, then at least a<br />

measure of toleration <strong>and</strong>, in the bargain, fosters the growth of<br />

democracy, which, it is alleged, is correlated closely with the rise<br />

of average st<strong>and</strong>ards of living. By ignoring unwieldy cultural factors<br />

<strong>and</strong> deep-seated antagonisms to Western peoples <strong>and</strong> values,<br />

one simplifies the problem of, let us say, India's place in what is<br />

called euphemistically the "free world": the West, by adding just<br />

the right amount of investment capital to India's government..<br />

directed economic development, can secure the survival, in India,<br />

of parliamentary government <strong>and</strong>, in world politics, assist India<br />

in becoming a counterweight to Red China. Proposals for such a<br />

Western "policy" toward India are loaded with eye-filling <strong>and</strong> vig..<br />

orously formulated statistics. The trouble with this neat solution<br />

-which, in the context of scientific economics, is perfectly plausible-is<br />

that the soul of India is. not the soul of America, that Indians<br />

cannot be equated with Chinese on the basis of per capita<br />

economic productivity, <strong>and</strong> that, strictly speaking, India is not a<br />

nation.<br />

III<br />

Since the social sciences are concerned with human action, an<br />

explanation of data can hardly be satisfying <strong>and</strong> valid unless it relates<br />

"objective" social phenomena to human purpose, intention,<br />

<strong>and</strong> values. This approach is underst<strong>and</strong>ably at odds with that of<br />

the natural scientist. It is also at odds with the idea of a centrally<br />

planned <strong>and</strong>, therefore, centrally controlled society. The obstacle<br />

to centralized, "scientific" planning is individual idiosyncrasy; i.e.,<br />

individual purpose, intention, <strong>and</strong> values. The most expeditious<br />

way around this obstacle is to assert that individual purpose, intention,<br />

<strong>and</strong> values are scientifically irrelevant or trivial <strong>and</strong> impervious<br />

to measurement <strong>and</strong>, therefore, should be left out of account.<br />

Likewise, it is argued that historical institutions, because they are<br />

the traditional repository of purpose, intention, <strong>and</strong> values, are not

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!