22.07.2013 Views

Scientism and Values.pdf - Ludwig von Mises Institute

Scientism and Values.pdf - Ludwig von Mises Institute

Scientism and Values.pdf - Ludwig von Mises Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

108 <strong>Scientism</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Values</strong><br />

the sponsorship of the Executive Board of this Association, may be<br />

summarized as follows: (1) Science cannot, through the medium of<br />

scientific method, demonstrate the validity or "rightness" of any<br />

particular point of view toward what is "good" for society <strong>and</strong> personality.<br />

(2) An attempt to do so perforce involves the scientist in<br />

contradictions <strong>and</strong> pushes him into the peculiar position of elevating<br />

his empirical knowledge to the level of values. (3) Therefore, science,<br />

on the one h<strong>and</strong>, <strong>and</strong> value-making, policy-making, <strong>and</strong> moral-making,<br />

on the other, are incompatible, <strong>and</strong> the individual must choose which<br />

of these he intends to pursue. (4) They conclude that (a) professionals<br />

as a group had best avoid the field of social pronouncement<br />

<strong>and</strong> value-supporting <strong>and</strong> adhere to science (Steward); <strong>and</strong> (b) the<br />

support of social movements <strong>and</strong> causes is all right <strong>and</strong> even advisable,<br />

but let us do so honestly with a frank declaration of our position,<br />

ab<strong>and</strong>oning the attempt to justify our st<strong>and</strong> scientifically (Barnett) .22<br />

Having thus discarded a reasoned statement of the method,<br />

function, <strong>and</strong> goals of science, Bennett stated what he considered<br />

the anthropologist's position <strong>and</strong> warned that science must st<strong>and</strong><br />

aside while the position is defended.<br />

. . . In the quarter-century of our discussion of racism a similar contradictory<br />

argument has been used: on the one h<strong>and</strong>, we have said<br />

that there are no differences between human groups; on the other,<br />

we have specified the scientific possibilities of difference <strong>and</strong> have<br />

discovered some. Scientifically we know that differences between<br />

human varieties can <strong>and</strong> do exist; ideologically it serves our purpose to<br />

deny them. We have had our cake <strong>and</strong> eaten it too, but few anthropologists<br />

would deplore our participation in the racist issue. We<br />

apparently took the course in that particular issue of not daring to<br />

admit the existence of differences, since we felt that a categorical<br />

denial had more social value than a half-admission of difference. 23<br />

(Italics added.)<br />

But it is in his footnote that he drops the seventh veil:<br />

Some of us say that the differences, while present, are unimportant.<br />

We say this, however, with a sinking feeling, since it always throws us<br />

open to the sneer: "See, first you said all races were equal, <strong>and</strong> now

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!