Scientism and Values.pdf - Ludwig von Mises Institute
Scientism and Values.pdf - Ludwig von Mises Institute
Scientism and Values.pdf - Ludwig von Mises Institute
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
16 <strong>Scientism</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Values</strong><br />
One additional point must be considered, however, before we<br />
return to the problem of value as an explanatory category in the<br />
social sciences. There are two levels of value clusters which are of<br />
particular significance for us. One is the cluster of felt <strong>and</strong><br />
ascribed values associated with man's affiliative needs; the other<br />
is the cluster of felt <strong>and</strong> ascribed values associated with the sense<br />
of fulfillment. The former encompasses the whole range of values<br />
pertaining to "communal" relations of individuals in actual<br />
societies. The latter consists of the ideal projections of self <strong>and</strong><br />
community "images," constituting patterns of culture which include<br />
most, if not all, of the other value clusters. That the transition<br />
between the two levels is fluid is obvious. Nevertheless,<br />
only the latter is the projection, of some ideal of a "cultured<br />
humanity," infusing the rest of man's valuations with their ultimate<br />
significance <strong>and</strong> with their relative importance. The degree<br />
of harmony (or disharmony) between the actualities of .any given<br />
society, on the one h<strong>and</strong>, <strong>and</strong> the' valuations inherent in its ideal<br />
projections, on the other, is in itself of greatest significance for<br />
an underst<strong>and</strong>ing of that society. The United Nations, in ideal<br />
conception <strong>and</strong> actual functioning, is but one obvious illustration<br />
of what I me.an.<br />
VII<br />
To some students of human behavior, in all its complexity,<br />
the institution is the real isolate of culture. And if this is so,<br />
then the valuations <strong>and</strong> value ascriptions embodied in institutions<br />
are the key to a real underst<strong>and</strong>ing of man's communal living<br />
<strong>and</strong> to the cultural pattern which dominates it.<br />
A "community" or "society," so I have said earlier, is possible<br />
only because, explicitly or implicitly, its members accept certain<br />
value commitments as binding for them. Mere spatial togetherness<br />
is not sufficient. Persistent value commitments are foundational<br />
to, <strong>and</strong> more or less clearly defined in, all institutions; <strong>and</strong> in <strong>and</strong><br />
through its institutions a society is structuralized-the structure<br />
reflecting a "hierarchy" of valuations. That there are "overlappings"<br />
of institutions merely confirms the fact that things <strong>and</strong>