22.07.2013 Views

Scientism and Values.pdf - Ludwig von Mises Institute

Scientism and Values.pdf - Ludwig von Mises Institute

Scientism and Values.pdf - Ludwig von Mises Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Growth} in Biology <strong>and</strong>' in Education 195<br />

He next describes growth ages briefly <strong>and</strong> then presents a graph<br />

in which the organismic .age curves of three groups of boys are<br />

compared to their reading curves. The boys were s,eparated into<br />

three groups on the basis of their reading scores at age eleven:<br />

fast, intermediate, <strong>and</strong> slow readers. The organismic age curve<br />

<strong>and</strong> the reading age curve of the fast readers are above the other<br />

curves from age six to eleven. Except for ages seven to eight the<br />

two curves for the intermediate readers are between the curves for<br />

slow readers <strong>and</strong> fast readers. Both curves for the slow readers<br />

are below the others except at age six, where the slow readers<br />

are slightly better ,at reading than the intermediate. On the basis<br />

of the graph Olson argues in support of equation 5 above.<br />

From this he moves to a model which consists of three approximately<br />

parallel lines extending diagonally across a growth agechronological<br />

age plot. The curves represent rapid, average, <strong>and</strong><br />

slow growth "according to the equation Maturation X Nurture<br />

= Development." Concerning this model Olson says:<br />

We can now set up a series of concepts involving known facts surrounding<br />

the model. These are of varying degrees of generalization,<br />

<strong>and</strong> each should be preceded by the qualification "other things being<br />

equal." The model is based on the assumption that the growth represented<br />

by the curves represents a composite according to the equation<br />

Maturation X Nurture = Development. Viewed alone it appears as<br />

a relatively static model with much stability <strong>and</strong> continuity. Injected<br />

into a social field, however, the children represented become dynamic<br />

in the sense of relationship to other individuals <strong>and</strong> to meeting the<br />

requirements of each situation.<br />

What general theory can be built around the model in the illustration?<br />

Principles of Human Development<br />

Concepts that will st<strong>and</strong> the test of universality, of experiment, <strong>and</strong><br />

of prediction are hard to come by in afield governed by multiple<br />

causation. When stated, such concepts are limited in the sense that<br />

other postulates may in part account for the phenomenon. There is<br />

always something of an indeterminant character when variable individuals<br />

experience variable nurture.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!